Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council , Cape Town , South Africa.
Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal , Durban , South Africa.
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1671663. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1671663.
: Stability of measures in quantitative social science research is crucial to understand. There is very little evidence on the stability of violence against women and girls measures in the global South. : To assess the test-retest stability of violence against women and girls measures, amongst young (18-30) people in South Africa. : Data were collected from 124 women and 112 men at zero weeks (time 1) and two weeks (time 2), who resided in urban informal settlements in South Africa. Prevalence of each construct was assessed using chi-square contingency tables. Stability of self-report over time was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. Bivariate logistic regression assessed factors associated with changing responses between time 1 and time 2. : At group level prevalence of all measures showed no significant differences. Stability of self-report: kappas for past year physical IPV were both k0.20, for ever physical IPV (women k0.58; men k0.50). Sexual IPV in past 12m (women k0.44; men k0.18), and for ever sexual IPV (women k0.56; men k0.46). Kappas for men's perpetration of non-partner sexual violence was k0.29 for past 12m and k0.38 ever. In bivariate regression, completion of secondary education was associated with a reduced odds of changing responses over the time-period for sexual IPV ever women (OR0.16, 0.02-1.04), sexual IPV past 12 months men (OR 0.09, 0.01-0.56), past 12 month non-partner sexual violence men (OR0.19, 0.02-1.41) and lifetime non-partner sexual violence (OR0.23, 0.04-1.19). Being male, compared to being female, was associated with an increased likelihood of changing responses for past 12 month sexual IPV (OR2.10, 1.08-4.09). : Prevalence estimates of violence against women measures are stable at group level, but stability of self-reported measures remains a concern. Individual statistical analyses must be treated with caution. Future studies are required to develop further understandings of stability of measures over time.
在定量社会科学研究中,衡量方法的稳定性至关重要。但在全球南方,关于暴力侵害妇女和女孩行为衡量方法稳定性的证据很少。本研究旨在评估南非年轻人(18-30 岁)中暴力侵害妇女和女孩行为衡量方法的重测稳定性。本研究在南非城市非正式住区招募了 124 名女性和 112 名男性,分别在零周(时间 1)和两周(时间 2)收集数据。使用卡方列联表评估每个结构的患病率。使用 Cohen's Kappa 评估自我报告随时间的稳定性。双变量逻辑回归评估了与时间 1 和时间 2 之间响应变化相关的因素。在群体水平上,所有措施的流行率均无显著差异。自我报告的稳定性:过去一年身体间性暴力的 Kappa 值均为 k0.20,过去身体间性暴力(女性 k0.58;男性 k0.50)。过去 12 个月的性暴力(女性 k0.44;男性 k0.18)和过去的性暴力(女性 k0.56;男性 k0.46)。男性非伴侣性暴力的 Kappa 值为过去 12 个月 k0.29 和过去 k0.38。在双变量回归中,完成中学教育与性暴力发生率降低有关,包括女性过去 12 个月的性暴力(OR0.16,0.02-1.04)、男性过去 12 个月的性暴力(OR0.09,0.01-0.56)、男性过去 12 个月非伴侣性暴力(OR0.19,0.02-1.41)和终生非伴侣性暴力(OR0.23,0.04-1.19)。与女性相比,男性更有可能改变过去 12 个月性暴力的反应(OR2.10,1.08-4.09)。在群体水平上,暴力侵害妇女措施的流行率估计是稳定的,但自我报告措施的稳定性仍然令人关注。必须谨慎对待个体统计分析。需要进一步的研究来深入了解随着时间的推移衡量方法的稳定性。