Sabbaj J, Hoagland V L, Shih W J
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Mar;27(3):297-301. doi: 10.1128/AAC.27.3.297.
Three hundred seventy patients with upper or lower urinary tract infections were entered into a multicenter, open comparative study. A total of 190 patients were treated with norfloxacin, and 180 patients were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The percentage of strains susceptible to norfloxacin (99%) was significantly greater (P less than 0.001) than the percentage of strains susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (90%). The percentages of patients with bacteriological outcomes of eradication were greater in the norfloxacin group (97%) than in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group (90%). The difference was significant (P less than 0.05). Seven patients (three treated with norfloxacin, four treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) experienced early reinfection. Of 370 patients entered into the study, 20 patients experienced clinical adverse effects that were probably or definitely related to the study drug; 6 patients were in the group that received norfloxacin, and 14 were in the group that received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Study antimicrobial agents were discontinued because of clinical adverse effects in eight patients (norfloxacin, one patient; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, seven patients). Three patients receiving norfloxacin and four patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had laboratory adverse effects which were classified as probably or definitely drug related. None of the clinical or laboratory adverse effects was serious.
370例上尿路或下尿路感染患者参与了一项多中心开放性对照研究。共190例患者接受诺氟沙星治疗,180例患者接受甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗。对诺氟沙星敏感的菌株百分比(99%)显著高于对甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑敏感的菌株百分比(90%)(P<0.001)。诺氟沙星组细菌学根除结果的患者百分比(97%)高于甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑组(90%)。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。7例患者(3例接受诺氟沙星治疗,4例接受甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗)出现早期再感染。在参与研究的370例患者中,20例患者出现可能或肯定与研究药物相关的临床不良反应;6例在接受诺氟沙星治疗的组中,14例在接受甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗的组中。8例患者(诺氟沙星组1例;甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑组7例)因临床不良反应而停用研究抗菌药物。3例接受诺氟沙星治疗的患者和4例接受甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗的患者出现实验室不良反应,这些反应被归类为可能或肯定与药物相关。所有临床或实验室不良反应均不严重。