• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treating acute urinary tract infections. An RCT of 3-day versus 7-day norfloxacin.治疗急性尿路感染。诺氟沙星3天疗法与7天疗法的随机对照试验。
Can Fam Physician. 1993 Mar;39:514-8.
2
Single-dose compared with 3-day norfloxacin treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Canadian Infectious Diseases Society Clinical Trials Study Group.单剂量与3日诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的比较。加拿大传染病协会临床试验研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jun;152(6):1233-7.
3
A multicenter comparative trial of three-day norfloxacin vs ten-day sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections.一项关于三日诺氟沙星与十日复方磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的多中心对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 1987 Oct;147(10):1760-2.
4
[Norfloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections].诺氟沙星治疗尿路感染
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1986 May 30;98(11):355-7.
5
Single-dose ciprofloxacin versus 3 days of norfloxacin in uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.单剂量环丙沙星与3天诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002 Jan;8(1):50-4.
6
Suppressive therapy with norfloxacin in patients with recurrent and/or complicated urinary tract infection.诺氟沙星对复发性和/或复杂性尿路感染患者的抑制性治疗。
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;110:307-11.
7
Randomized double-blind trial of high- and low-dose fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for complicated urinary tract infection.高剂量和低剂量氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的随机双盲试验。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):101S-104S.
8
Norfloxacin: a three-day course for the treatment of urinary tract infection.诺氟沙星：用于治疗尿路感染的三日疗程。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1985;11(3):177-9.
9
Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for oral treatment of serious urinary tract infections.氟罗沙星与诺氟沙星口服治疗严重尿路感染的比较。
Am J Med. 1993 Mar 22;94(3A):105S-107S.
10
Low-dose norfloxacin versus placebo for long-term prophylaxis of recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infection.低剂量诺氟沙星与安慰剂用于复发性单纯性尿路感染的长期预防
Chemioterapia. 1987 Jun;6(2 Suppl):533-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of quinolones for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a network meta-analysis.喹诺酮类药物治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的疗效与安全性：一项网状Meta分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jan;32(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04255-y. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.提高药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;2014(11):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4.
3
Antibiotic duration for treating uncomplicated, symptomatic lower urinary tract infections in elderly women.老年女性单纯性、有症状下尿路感染的抗生素治疗疗程
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD001535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001535.pub2.
4
Quinolones for uncomplicated acute cystitis in women.喹诺酮类药物用于治疗女性单纯性急性膀胱炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003597.pub2.
5
All dysuria is local. A cost-effectiveness model for designing site-specific management algorithms.所有排尿困难都是局部性的。一种用于设计特定部位管理算法的成本效益模型。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 1):433-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.10440.x.
6
Management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in general practice in the south of The Netherlands.荷兰南部全科医疗中急性单纯性尿路感染的管理
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Apr;50(453):309-10.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of acute urinary infection by norfloxacin or nalidixic acid/citrate: a multi-centre comparative study.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 May;13 Suppl B:99-105. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.suppl_b.99.
2
Interpretation and comparison of treatment studies for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.女性单纯性尿路感染治疗研究的解读与比较
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;7(4):468-78. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.4.468.
3
Single-dose antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Less for less?单剂量抗生素治疗单纯性尿路感染。少用就够吗？
Arch Intern Med. 1985 Sep;145(9):1672-8.
4
Ocular parasitic infection in Thailand.泰国的眼部寄生虫感染
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 May-Jun;8(3):350-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.3.350.
5
Norfloxacin versus co-trimoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infections in adults: microbiological results of a coordinated multicentre study.诺氟沙星与复方新诺明治疗成人尿路感染的比较：一项多中心协作研究的微生物学结果
Scand J Infect Dis. 1987;19(5):551-7. doi: 10.3109/00365548709032422.
6
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for acute dysuria in women: a single-dose or 10-day course. A double-blind, randomized trial.甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗女性急性排尿困难：单剂量或10天疗程。一项双盲随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1988 Mar;108(3):350-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-3-350.
7
Multiclinic comparative study of norfloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infections.诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗尿路感染的多中心比较研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Mar;27(3):297-301. doi: 10.1128/AAC.27.3.297.
8
Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents.氟喹诺酮类抗菌剂。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Oct;2(4):378-424. doi: 10.1128/CMR.2.4.378.
9
Value of new quinolones in the treatment and prophylaxis of infectious diseases: introductory remarks.新型喹诺酮类药物在传染病治疗与预防中的价值：引言
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Dec;8(12):1071-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01975173.
10
Different lengths of treatment with co-trimoxazole for acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.女性急性单纯性尿路感染使用复方新诺明不同疗程的治疗情况
BMJ. 1989 Nov 25;299(6711):1319-22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6711.1319.

治疗急性尿路感染。诺氟沙星3天疗法与7天疗法的随机对照试验。

Treating acute urinary tract infections. An RCT of 3-day versus 7-day norfloxacin.

作者信息

Trienekens T A, London N H, Houben A W, De Jong R A, Stobberingh E E

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital in Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 1993 Mar;39:514-8.

PMID:8471899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2379759/
Abstract

A randomized, controlled trial was carried out to compare two courses of treatment in women with acute urinary tract infection in general practice. The 3-day course of treatment was found to be as effective as, and cheaper than, the 7-day therapy.

摘要

在全科医疗中开展了一项随机对照试验，以比较两种治疗方案对急性尿路感染女性患者的疗效。结果发现，3天疗程的治疗与7天疗程同样有效，且费用更低。