Botany Department, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Ann Bot. 2020 Apr 25;125(5):765-773. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz156.
Global warming has large effects on the performance and spatial distribution of plants, and increasingly facilitates the spread of invasive species. Particularly vulnerable is the vegetation of cold environments where indigenous plants selected for cold tolerance can have reduced phenotypic plasticity and associated lower capacity to respond to warming temperatures. In contrast, invasive species can be phenotypically plastic and respond positively to climate change, but at the expense of stress tolerance.
We investigate this trade-off in traits, measuring the photosynthetic response to warming, chilling tolerance and specific leaf area (SLA) of Pooid grasses. We compare this between invasive and non-invasive grasses and correlate this to their range expansions on a cold sub-Antarctic island that has warmed significantly in the past five decades. We determined whether these responses remained consistent after temperature acclimation.
Invasive species responded strongly to warming, increasing photosynthetic rates by up to 2-fold, while non-invasive species did not respond. The response was associated with increased stomatal conductance, but not with modified photosynthetic metabolism. Electrolyte leakage and SLA were higher in invasive than in non-invasive species. Acclimation altered the photosynthetic response and invasive species responded to warm temperatures irrespective of acclimation, while non-invasive species responded only after acclimation to warm temperature.
Traits scaled linearly with rates of range expansion and demonstrate that under sub-Antarctic conditions, anthropogenic warming over the last 50 years may have favoured species with greater capacity to respond photosynthetically to warming to the detriment of species that cannot, and negated the advantage that chilling tolerance would have conferred on endemic species in the past. This suggests that species of cold ecosystems could be particularly vulnerable to warming as selection for stress tolerance has limited their responsiveness to environmental change, while introduced invasive species may have no such limitations. We show mechanistic evidence of the physiology that underpins an apparent trade-off between warming and chilling tolerance traits.
全球变暖对植物的性能和空间分布有很大影响,并越来越有利于入侵物种的传播。特别容易受到影响的是寒冷环境中的植被,那里适应寒冷的本地植物的表型可塑性可能降低,对变暖温度的适应能力也随之降低。相比之下,入侵物种的表型可塑性较强,对气候变化有积极反应,但代价是降低了对压力的耐受能力。
我们通过测量对变暖的光合作用响应、耐寒性和特定叶面积(SLA)来研究这些性状之间的权衡。我们将入侵物种和非入侵物种进行了比较,并将其与过去五十年中在寒冷的亚南极岛屿上显著变暖的范围扩张相关联。我们还确定了这些反应在温度驯化后是否仍然一致。
入侵物种对变暖的反应强烈,光合作用速率增加了 2 倍,而非入侵物种则没有反应。这种反应与气孔导度的增加有关,但与光合作用代谢的改变无关。电解质泄漏和 SLA 在入侵物种中比非入侵物种更高。驯化改变了光合作用的反应,而入侵物种对温暖温度的反应不论驯化与否,而非入侵物种只有在适应温暖温度后才会有反应。
性状与范围扩张的速度呈线性关系,表明在亚南极条件下,过去 50 年人类引起的变暖可能有利于对光合作用对变暖的反应能力更强的物种,而不利于不能适应的物种,并抵消了耐寒性在过去对本地物种的优势。这表明,寒冷生态系统的物种可能特别容易受到变暖的影响,因为对压力耐受的选择限制了它们对环境变化的反应能力,而引入的入侵物种可能没有这种限制。我们展示了支持在变暖与耐寒性性状之间存在明显权衡的生理学机制证据。