Department of Genetics, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Department of Computational Biology and Applied Algorithmics, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Nov 18;47(20):10580-10596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz799.
Chromatin accessibility maps are important for the functional interpretation of the genome. Here, we systematically analysed assay specific differences between DNase I-seq, ATAC-seq and NOMe-seq in a side by side experimental and bioinformatic setup. We observe that most prominent nucleosome depleted regions (NDRs, e.g. in promoters) are roboustly called by all three or at least two assays. However, we also find a high proportion of assay specific NDRs that are often 'called' by only one of the assays. We show evidence that these assay specific NDRs are indeed genuine open chromatin sites and contribute important information for accurate gene expression prediction. While technically ATAC-seq and DNase I-seq provide a superb high NDR calling rate for relatively low sequencing costs in comparison to NOMe-seq, NOMe-seq singles out for its genome-wide coverage allowing to not only detect NDRs but also endogenous DNA methylation and as we show here genome wide segmentation into heterochromatic B domains and local phasing of nucleosomes outside of NDRs. In summary, our comparisons strongly suggest to consider assay specific differences for the experimental design and for generalized and comparative functional interpretations.
染色质可及性图谱对于基因组的功能解释很重要。在这里,我们在一个平行的实验和生物信息学设置中系统地分析了 DNase I-seq、ATAC-seq 和 NOMe-seq 之间特定于检测的差异。我们观察到,大多数突出的核小体缺失区域(NDR,例如启动子)被所有三种或至少两种检测方法可靠地称为。然而,我们也发现了很大比例的特定于检测的 NDR,这些区域通常只被一种检测方法“称为”。我们提供了证据表明,这些特定于检测的 NDR 确实是真正的开放染色质位点,为准确预测基因表达提供了重要信息。虽然在技术上 ATAC-seq 和 DNase I-seq 相对于 NOMe-seq 提供了出色的高 NDR 调用率,并且测序成本相对较低,但 NOMe-seq 则具有全基因组覆盖范围,不仅可以检测 NDR,还可以检测内源性 DNA 甲基化,并且正如我们在这里展示的那样,还可以将基因组范围划分为异染色质 B 域,并在 NDR 之外局部排列核小体。总之,我们的比较强烈建议在实验设计和广义及比较功能解释中考虑特定于检测的差异。