• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轴向加载磁共振成像显示经皮棘突间植入物(Aperius™ PerCLID™)对椎管面积的效果不足。

Axial loading during MRI reveals insufficient effect of percutaneous interspinous implants (Aperius™ PerCLID™) on spinal canal area.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2020 Jan;29(1):122-128. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06159-y. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-019-06159-y
PMID:31584119
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect on the spinal canal at the treated and adjacent level(s), in patients treated for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with percutaneous interspinous process device (IPD) Aperius™ or open decompressive surgery (ODS), using axial loading of the spine during MRI (alMRI).

MATERIALS

Nineteen LSS patients (mean age 67 years, range 49-78) treated with IPDs in 29 spine levels and 13 LSS patients (mean age 63 years, range 46-76) operated with ODS in 22 spine levels were examined with alMRI pre- and 3 months postoperatively. Radiological effects were evaluated by measuring the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) and by morphological grading of nerve root affection.

RESULTS

For the IPD group, no DSCSA increase was observed at the operated level (p = 0.42); however, a decrease was observed in adjacent levels (p = 0.05). No effect was seen regarding morphological grading (operated level: p = 0.71/adjacent level: p = 0.94). For the ODS group, beneficial effects were seen for the operated level, both regarding DSCSA (p < 0.001) and for morphological grading (p < 0.0001). No changes were seen for adjacent levels (DSCSA; p = 0.47/morphological grading: p = 0.95). Postoperatively, a significant difference between the groups existed at the operated level regarding both evaluated parameters (p < 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

With the spine imaged in an axial loaded position, no significant radiological effects of an IPD could be detected postoperatively at the treated level, while increased DSCSA was displayed for the ODS group. In addition, reduced DSCSA in adjacent levels was detected for the IPD group. Thus, the beneficial effects of IPD implants on the spinal canal must be questioned. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

摘要

目的

通过 MRI 下脊柱轴向加载(alMRI)评估接受经皮棘突间撑开器(IPD)AperiusTM 或开放性减压手术(ODS)治疗的腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者治疗节段和临近节段椎管的变化。

材料

19 例接受 IPD 治疗的 LSS 患者(平均年龄 67 岁,范围 49-78 岁)共 29 个节段和 13 例接受 ODS 治疗的 LSS 患者(平均年龄 63 岁,范围 46-76 岁)共 22 个节段,分别于术前和术后 3 个月进行 alMRI 检查。通过测量硬脊膜囊横截面积(DSCSA)和神经根受累的形态学分级评估影像学变化。

结果

在 IPD 组,未观察到手术节段的 DSCSA 增加(p=0.42);然而,在临近节段观察到减少(p=0.05)。形态学分级未见影响(手术节段:p=0.71/临近节段:p=0.94)。对于 ODS 组,手术节段的 DSCSA(p<0.001)和形态学分级(p<0.0001)均有获益。临近节段未见变化(DSCSA;p=0.47/形态学分级:p=0.95)。术后,两组在评估参数上均存在手术节段的显著差异(p<0.003)。

结论

在轴向加载状态下对脊柱成像,术后在治疗节段未发现 IPD 的明显放射学影响,而 ODS 组的 DSCSA 增加。此外,在 IPD 组还观察到临近节段的 DSCSA 减少。因此,必须对 IPD 植入物对椎管的有益影响提出质疑。这些幻灯片可以在电子补充材料中检索到。

相似文献

1
Axial loading during MRI reveals insufficient effect of percutaneous interspinous implants (Aperius™ PerCLID™) on spinal canal area.轴向加载磁共振成像显示经皮棘突间植入物(Aperius™ PerCLID™)对椎管面积的效果不足。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jan;29(1):122-128. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06159-y. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
2
Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).脊板切除术作为一种椎管减压的手术方法:术前与术后硬脊膜囊横截面积(DSCSA)的评估。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1913-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2737-1. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
3
Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.轴向加载磁共振成像对疑似腰椎管狭窄症患者的诊断意义。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e69-e75. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.091. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
4
Diagnostic advancement of axial loaded lumbar spine MRI in patients with clinically suspected central spinal canal stenosis.轴向负荷腰椎 MRI 对临床疑似中央椎管狭窄患者的诊断进展。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 1;38(21):E1342-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a0dfa5.
5
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.使用Aperius™ PerCLID™系统和Falena®棘突间间隔器治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症:临床结果和生活质量的1年随访
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;22(2):217-26. doi: 10.1177/1591019915622163. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?轴向加载在腰椎管狭窄症患者磁共振成像中的应用:它是否能重现直立性椎管造影检测到的硬脊膜囊位置变化?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):E985-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821038f2.
7
Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis.新型轴向加载 MRI 设备在疑似腰椎椎管狭窄症患者中的诊断价值。
Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3200-3210. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09447-w. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Analysis of radiological parameters associated with decreased fractional anisotropy values on diffusion tensor imaging in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.分析与腰椎椎管狭窄症患者弥散张量成像上各向异性分数值降低相关的放射学参数。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jun;28(6):1397-1405. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5562-8. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study.中央型腰椎管狭窄减压手术后直至2年,硬脊膜囊横截面积的变化:手术节段研究,来自NORDSTEN研究的数据
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2234-2241. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08251-4. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
10
Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.与椎管面积相比,硬膜囊面积是评估腰椎管狭窄症更敏感的参数:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e9087. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009087.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar spinal stenosis: an MRI study using a new axial loading device.轴向负荷及体位对腰椎管狭窄症的影响:一项使用新型轴向负荷装置的磁共振成像研究
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Feb;54(2):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04720-5. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
2
Axial loading lumbar magnetic resonance imaging with a new device in asymptomatic individuals.使用一种新设备对无症状个体进行轴向负荷腰椎磁共振成像。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):58-65. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-283. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
The use of minimally invasive interspinous process devices for the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis: a narrative literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.与椎管面积相比,硬膜囊面积是评估腰椎管狭窄症更敏感的参数:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e9087. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009087.
2
Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer vs Decompression in Patients with Neurogenic Claudication: An Alternative in Selected Patients?经皮棘突间撑开器与减压术治疗神经性跛行患者:对特定患者的一种替代选择?
Neurosurgery. 2018 May 1;82(5):621-629. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx326.
3
Is There Still a Role for Interspinous Spacers in the Management of Neurogenic Claudication?
使用微创棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一篇叙述性文献综述。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Sep;7(3):394-412. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-57.
4
Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症最有效的治疗方法是什么:减压、融合还是棘突间装置?一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Sep 26;26:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003. eCollection 2021 Jan.
棘突间撑开器在神经源性间歇性跛行治疗中仍有作用吗?
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Jul;28(3):321-330. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.002.
4
Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review.棘突间植入物:新一代植入物是否优于上一代?一篇综述。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):189-198. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9401-z.
5
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.使用Aperius™ PerCLID™系统和Falena®棘突间间隔器治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症:临床结果和生活质量的1年随访
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;22(2):217-26. doi: 10.1177/1591019915622163. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症的Aperius棘突间装置:综述
Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Apr;39(2):197-205; discussion 205. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0664-9. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
7
Midterm Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes after Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer Treatment for Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication.经皮棘突间间隔器治疗神经源性间歇性跛行的中期临床和影像学结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Nov;26(11):1687-93.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis results in increased reoperation rates and costs without improving patient outcomes.与标准传统手术减压相比,棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症会导致再次手术率和成本增加,且未改善患者预后。
Evid Based Med. 2014 Aug;19(4):136. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101689. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
9
Change of radiological parameters after interspinous implantation (X-stop®) in degenerative spinal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄症经棘突间植入(X-stop®)后影像学参数的变化
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Apr;23(3):281-5. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-0986-z. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
10
Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis: results of a Delphi survey.脊柱狭窄症的放射学诊断标准:德尔菲调查结果。
Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):174-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111930. Epub 2012 May 1.