• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与一项环境科学案例研究的研究影响评估。

Engaging with research impact assessment for an environmental science case study.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4542. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12020-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-12020-z
PMID:31586044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6778146/
Abstract

Impact assessment is embedded in many national and international research rating systems. Most applications use the Research Impact Pathway to track inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes of an invention or initiative to assess impact beyond scholarly contributions to an academic research field (i.e., benefits to environment, society, economy and culture). Existing approaches emphasise easy to attribute 'hard' impacts, and fail to include a range of 'soft' impacts that are less easy to attribute, yet are often a dominant part of the impact mix. Here, we develop an inclusive 3-part impact mapping approach. We demonstrate its application using an environmental initiative.

摘要

影响评估嵌入在许多国家和国际研究评级系统中。大多数应用程序使用研究影响途径来跟踪发明或计划的投入、活动、产出和结果,以评估超出学术研究领域的学术贡献的影响(即,对环境、社会、经济和文化的益处)。现有的方法强调易于归因的“硬”影响,而未能包括一系列较难归因的“软”影响,但这些影响往往是影响组合的主要部分。在这里,我们开发了一种包容性的三部分影响映射方法。我们使用一个环境倡议来演示其应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f3/6778146/467b528c1905/41467_2019_12020_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f3/6778146/160dfc3222d1/41467_2019_12020_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f3/6778146/467b528c1905/41467_2019_12020_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f3/6778146/160dfc3222d1/41467_2019_12020_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f3/6778146/467b528c1905/41467_2019_12020_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Engaging with research impact assessment for an environmental science case study.参与一项环境科学案例研究的研究影响评估。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4542. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12020-z.
2
Assessing the performance of NHS hospital trusts: the role of 'hard' and 'soft' information.评估国民保健服务医院信托机构的绩效:“硬”信息和“软”信息的作用。
Health Policy. 1999 Aug;48(2):119-34. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00035-4.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership.探索合作中确定卫生研究重点的挑战:对詹姆斯·林德联盟压疮重点确定合作项目所采用方法的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 2;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y. eCollection 2016.
5
Comparison of nickel toxicity to cladocerans in soft versus hard surface waters.软水与硬表面水中镍对枝角类毒性的比较。
Aquat Toxicol. 2007 Aug 30;84(2):223-35. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.03.025. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
6
Research Metrics for Health Science Schools: A Conceptual Exploration and Proposal.健康科学院校的研究指标:概念性探索与建议
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Apr 25;7:817821. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.817821. eCollection 2022.
7
8
GroundsWell: Community-engaged and data-informed systems transformation of Urban Green and Blue Space for population health - a new initiative.GroundsWell:以社区为导向、基于数据的城市绿色和蓝色空间系统转型促进人群健康——一项新倡议。
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Sep 20;7:237. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18175.1. eCollection 2022.
9
Mobility management to prevent, reduce, or delay driving a car in teenagers.针对青少年的行动管理,以预防、减少或推迟其驾驶汽车。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 16;8(8):CD009438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009438.pub2.
10
Databases for knowledge discovery. Examples from biomedicine and health care.用于知识发现的数据库。来自生物医学和医疗保健领域的示例。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):257-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.08.012. Epub 2005 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the quality of studies funded by the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research, 2010-2020.评估2010 - 2020年以色列国家卫生政策研究所资助研究的质量。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 5;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00672-w.
2
The impact of conducting preclinical systematic reviews on researchers and their research: A mixed method case study.开展临床前系统评价对研究人员及其研究的影响:一项混合方法案例研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 13;16(12):e0260619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260619. eCollection 2021.
3
Applying a framework to assess the impact of cardiovascular outcomes improvement research.

本文引用的文献

1
What's in a name? A naming convention for geomorphic river types using the River Styles Framework.名称有何意义?使用河流形态框架对地貌河流类型进行命名约定。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0201909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201909. eCollection 2018.
2
Building optimism at the environmental science-policy-practice interface through the study of bright spots.通过研究亮点,在环境科学-政策-实践界面建立乐观情绪。
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 28;9(1):3466. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05977-w.
3
New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams.
应用一个框架来评估心血管结局改善研究的影响。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Apr 21;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00710-4.
4
Things we can do now that we could not do before: Developing and using a cross-scalar, state-wide database to support geomorphologically-informed river management.现在我们可以做以前做不到的事情:开发和使用跨尺度、全州范围的数据库,以支持基于地貌的河流管理。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0244719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244719. eCollection 2021.
5
New Approaches to Identifying and Reducing the Global Burden of Disease From Pollution.识别和减轻污染所致全球疾病负担的新方法。
Geohealth. 2020 Mar 25;4(4):e2018GH000167. doi: 10.1029/2018GH000167. eCollection 2020 Apr.
欧洲河流形态水文学评估与监测的新工具。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Nov 1;202(Pt 2):363-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.036. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
The Blurred Line between Form and Process: A Comparison of Stream Channel Classification Frameworks.形态与过程之间的模糊界限:河流渠道分类框架比较
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0150293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150293. eCollection 2016.
5
Research impact: income for outcome.研究影响:成果带来收入。
Nature. 2014 Jul 24;511(7510):S72-5. doi: 10.1038/511S72a.
6
Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework.描述健康研究的影响:一个研究影响框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 18;6:134. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-134.