• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入院创伤患儿的交通方式与创伤激活状态。

Mode of Transport and Trauma Activation Status in Admitted Pediatric Trauma Patients.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Surgery, Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.008
PMID:31586889
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injured children who arrive by self-transport to the emergency department (ED) may receive delayed or inadequate care. We studied differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and trauma activation status for admitted pediatric trauma patients based on arrival by self-transport or Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at two level I pediatric trauma centers.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

<15 y old with blunt or penetrating injury. We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine associations between trauma activation, ED length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS with demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 1161 patients: 40.1% arrived by self-transport and 59.9% by EMS. Self-transport patients were less likely to have an abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale score < 15 (2.1% versus 22.0%, P < 0.001) and Injury Severity Score > 15 (2.4% versus 11.7%, P < 0.001). Trauma activation was initiated in 52.5% of patients, occurring less often in self-transport than EMS patients (2.4% versus 86.2%, P < 0.001). Trauma activation rate was negatively associated with arrival by self-transport (odds ratio [OR] 0.001, 95% CI 0.00-0.003), positively associated with Glasgow Coma Scale <15 (OR 25.9, 95% CI 6.6-101.2) and site (OR 15.4, 95% CI 6.3-37.5) but not with Injury Severity Score >15 (OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.8-9.2). Self-transport arrival was associated with longer ED LOS (estimated regression slope 0.47, 95% CI 0.13-0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half of admitted pediatric trauma patients arrived by self-transport; however, trauma team activation rarely occurs for these patients. Trauma team activation may be underutilized in self-transport patients with injuries resulting in hospital admission.

摘要

背景

自行到急诊科(ED)就诊的受伤儿童可能会接受延迟或不充分的治疗。我们研究了根据自行转运或紧急医疗服务(EMS)到达的住院儿科创伤患者在人口统计学、临床特征和创伤激活状态方面的差异。

材料和方法

我们在两个一级儿科创伤中心进行了回顾性队列研究。

纳入标准

<15 岁,有钝器或穿透伤。我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来确定创伤激活、ED 住院时间(LOS)和住院 LOS 与人口统计学和临床特征之间的关联。

结果

我们共纳入 1161 例患者:40.1%自行转运,59.9%由 EMS 转运。自行转运的患者格拉斯哥昏迷评分<15(2.1% vs 22.0%,P<0.001)和损伤严重程度评分>15(2.4% vs 11.7%,P<0.001)的可能性较小。52.5%的患者启动了创伤激活,自行转运的患者比 EMS 转运的患者启动创伤激活的频率较低(2.4% vs 86.2%,P<0.001)。创伤激活率与自行转运呈负相关(比值比 [OR] 0.001,95%置信区间 0.00-0.003),与格拉斯哥昏迷评分<15(OR 25.9,95%置信区间 6.6-101.2)和部位(OR 15.4,95%置信区间 6.3-37.5)呈正相关,但与损伤严重程度评分>15(OR 2.8,95%置信区间 0.8-9.2)无关。自行转运到达与 ED LOS 延长有关(估计回归斜率 0.47,95%置信区间 0.13-0.82)。

结论

近一半的住院儿科创伤患者自行到达;然而,这些患者很少启动创伤小组激活。对于因受伤而住院的自行转运患者,创伤小组的激活可能未得到充分利用。

相似文献

1
Mode of Transport and Trauma Activation Status in Admitted Pediatric Trauma Patients.入院创伤患儿的交通方式与创伤激活状态。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
2
Evaluation of the criteria for trauma activation in the paediatric emergency department.评估儿科急诊创伤激活标准。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Sep;36(9):529-534. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207857. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
3
Do prehospital criteria optimally assign injured children to the appropriate level of trauma team activation and emergency department disposition at a level I pediatric trauma center?在一级儿科创伤中心,院前标准能否将受伤儿童最佳地分配到适当级别的创伤团队启动和急诊科处置中?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Nov;30(11):1097-102. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3587-6. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
4
Rapid Ground Transport of Trauma Patients: A Moderate Distance From Trauma Center Improves Survival.创伤患者的快速地面转运:距离创伤中心适度的路程可提高生存率。
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:318-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.055. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Characteristics of pediatric trauma transfers to a level i trauma center: implications for developing a regionalized pediatric trauma system in california.儿科创伤转送至一级创伤中心的特征:对加利福尼亚州建立区域性儿科创伤系统的启示。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1364-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00926.x.
6
Does scene physiology predict helicopter transport trauma admission?现场生理学能否预测直升机转运创伤入院?
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 25.
7
Association of Prehospital Step 1 Vital Sign Criteria and Vital Sign Decline with Increased Emergency Department and Hospital Death.院前第一步生命体征标准及生命体征下降与急诊科及医院死亡增加的关联。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
8
Helicopter Transport From the Scene of Injury: Are There Improved Outcomes for Pediatric Trauma Patients?从受伤现场进行直升机转运:儿科创伤患者的治疗效果是否有所改善?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 May;34(5):344-348. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001190.
9
Delayed trauma team activation: patient characteristics and outcomes.延迟创伤团队激活:患者特征和结局。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):695-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825abf6f.
10
Comparison of children receiving emergent sepsis care by mode of arrival.比较不同到达方式的儿童接受急诊脓毒症治疗的情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:217-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.053. Epub 2021 Apr 21.