Suppr超能文献

院前第一步生命体征标准及生命体征下降与急诊科及医院死亡增加的关联。

Association of Prehospital Step 1 Vital Sign Criteria and Vital Sign Decline with Increased Emergency Department and Hospital Death.

作者信息

Warwick James W, Davenport Daniel L, Bettis Amber, Bernard Andrew C

机构信息

University of Kentucky College of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.

Division of Healthcare Outcomes and Optimal Patient Services, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed data from the 2017 American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank to examine the effects of pre-hospital Field Triage Decision Scheme Step 1 vital sign criteria (S1C) and vital sign decline on subsequent emergency department (ED) and hospital death in emergency medical services (EMS) transported trauma victims.

STUDY DESIGN

Patient and injury characteristics, transport time, and ED and hospital disposition were collected. S1C (respiratory rate [RR]<10, RR>29 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure [SBP]<90 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]<14) were recorded at the injury scene and hospital arrival. Decline was defined as a change ≥ 1 standard deviation (SD) into or within an S1C range. S1C and decline were analyzed relative to ED and hospital death using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 333,213 included patients, 54,849 (16.5%) met Step 1 criteria at the scene, and 21,566 (6.9%) declined en route. The ED death rate was 0.4% (n = 1,188), and the hospital death/hospice rate was 4.0% (11,624 of 287,675). Patients who met S1C at the scene or who declined were more likely to require longer hospital lengths of stay, ICU admission, and surgical intervention. S1C and decline patients had higher odds of death in both the ED (S1C odds ratio [OR] 15.1, decline OR 2.4, p values < 0.001) and hospital (S1C OR 4.8, decline OR 2.0, p values < 0.001) after adjusting for patient demographics, transport time and mode, injury severity, and injury mechanism. Each S1C and decline measure was independently predictive of death.

CONCLUSIONS

This study quantifies the mortality risks associated with individual S1C and validates their use as an indicator for injury severity and pre-hospital triage tool.

摘要

背景

本研究分析了2017年美国外科医师学会国家创伤数据库的数据,以检验院前现场分诊决策方案第一步生命体征标准(S1C)和生命体征下降对急诊医疗服务(EMS)转运的创伤患者随后在急诊科(ED)和医院死亡的影响。

研究设计

收集患者和损伤特征、转运时间以及急诊科和医院处置情况。在受伤现场和医院到达时记录S1C(呼吸频率[RR]<10次/分钟、RR>29次/分钟、收缩压[SBP]<90mmHg、格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]<14)。下降定义为进入或处于S1C范围内的变化≥1个标准差(SD)。使用逻辑回归分析S1C和下降情况与急诊科和医院死亡的相关性。

结果

在纳入的333,213例患者中,54,849例(16.5%)在现场符合第一步标准,21,566例(6.9%)在途中病情恶化。急诊科死亡率为0.4%(n = 1,188),医院死亡/临终关怀率为4.0%(287,675例中的11,624例)。在现场符合S1C或病情恶化的患者更有可能需要更长的住院时间、入住重症监护病房(ICU)和接受手术干预。在调整患者人口统计学、转运时间和方式、损伤严重程度及损伤机制后,S1C和病情恶化患者在急诊科(S1C比值比[OR]为15.1,病情恶化OR为2.4,p值<0.001)和医院(S1C OR为4.8,病情恶化OR为2.0,p值<0.001)的死亡几率更高。每项S1C和病情恶化指标均独立预测死亡。

结论

本研究量化了与个体S1C相关的死亡风险,并验证了其作为损伤严重程度指标和院前分诊工具的用途。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验