Rocco Pallin ( rspallin@ucdavis. edu ) is a research data analyst in the Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California (UC) Davis School of Medicine, in Sacramento.
Amanda Charbonneau is a postdoctoral fellow in the Violence Prevention Research Program.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Oct;38(10):1744-1751. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00602.
Medical and public health organizations have recommended that health professionals discuss firearm safety with patients at risk for gun-related injury, yet few health professionals do so. Concerns that patients may view conversations about firearms as inappropriate have been reported in prior studies. Using state-representative data from the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey, this study found that most Californians report gun safety conversations with health professionals to be at least sometimes appropriate when these conversations involved a patient who had a known risk factor for firearm-related harm (depending on the risk factor, 83.7-90.2 percent among all respondents and 70.0-91.2 percent among firearm owners). Majorities of respondents also found intervention by health professionals for those at imminent risk to be at least sometimes appropriate (depending on the intervention, 84.0-89.9 percent among all respondents and 82.6-91.0 percent among firearm owners). These findings can inform health policy and education on clinical strategies for preventing firearm-related harm.
医学和公共卫生组织建议卫生专业人员与有枪支伤害风险的患者讨论枪支安全问题,但很少有卫生专业人员这样做。在之前的研究中,有报道称患者可能认为有关枪支的对话不适当。本研究使用来自 2018 年加利福尼亚安全与健康调查的州代表性数据发现,当这些对话涉及有枪支伤害相关风险因素的已知患者时,大多数加利福尼亚人认为与卫生专业人员进行枪支安全对话至少在某些情况下是适当的(根据风险因素,所有受访者中有 83.7-90.2%,枪支拥有者中有 70.0-91.2%)。大多数受访者还认为卫生专业人员对即将面临风险的人进行干预至少在某些情况下是适当的(根据干预措施,所有受访者中有 84.0-89.9%,枪支拥有者中有 82.6-91.0%)。这些发现可以为预防枪支相关伤害的临床策略的卫生政策和教育提供信息。