Suppr超能文献

聚氨酯假体隆乳术中的错误类型:系统评价。

Types of Errors Made During Breast Augmentation with Polyurethane Implants: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Medical Center "Antes Med", Krasnoarmejskaja Str. 32, Minsk, 220030, Belarus.

Belorussian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Brovki 3, b. 3, Minsk, 220013, Belarus.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;44(1):70-79. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01510-6. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementation of polyurethane-covered (PU) implants into practice requires a reassessment of the experience and a learning curve period. Occasional publications describe a few difficulties in this regard. However, there are no publications covering the spectrum of errors. The absence of definite information and contradictory findings makes the learning curve longer leading to many unsatisfactory results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematization is based on the 12 years of experience with over 1000 patients and previously published data. A literature review was conducted using PUBMED with the following keywords: polyurethane or foam or sponge and breast and implant. A total of 285 articles were found (last accessed 08/13/2019). All articles concerning polyurethane implants were studied along with any articles found describing the surgical techniques applied to them. Additional references found in the above-mentioned articles were also included in the study.

RESULTS

All errors can be divided into planning errors, errors in pocket development and surface-dependent errors, for which the polyurethane surface is the main reason. Surface-dependent errors include the errors connected to positioning and biointegration. The possible causes of late seroma with PU implants are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The polyurethane surface should not be considered textured in the clinical point of view. Previous experience with non-PU implants cannot be transferred to PU implants. The learning curve is unavoidable. The systematization of errors with PU implants facilitates a decision-making process during the primary and secondary surgery and lowers the risk of the unsatisfactory results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

摘要

背景

将聚氨酯覆盖(PU)植入物投入实践需要重新评估经验并经历学习曲线阶段。偶尔有出版物描述了这方面的一些困难。然而,没有出版物涵盖错误的全貌。缺乏明确的信息和相互矛盾的发现使得学习曲线更长,导致许多不满意的结果。

材料与方法

系统化基于 12 年来对超过 1000 名患者的经验和以前发表的数据。使用 PUBMED 进行文献回顾,使用以下关键字:聚氨酯或泡沫或海绵和乳房和植入物。共找到 285 篇文章(最后访问时间为 2019 年 8 月 13 日)。研究了所有涉及聚氨酯植入物的文章,以及任何描述应用于它们的手术技术的文章。还包括在上述文章中发现的其他参考文献。

结果

所有错误都可以分为规划错误、口袋发育错误和表面相关错误,其中聚氨酯表面是主要原因。表面相关错误包括与定位和生物整合相关的错误。讨论了 PU 植入物迟发性血清肿的可能原因。

结论

从临床角度来看,不应将聚氨酯表面视为纹理表面。以前非 PU 植入物的经验不能转移到 PU 植入物。学习曲线是不可避免的。PU 植入物错误的系统化有助于在原发性和继发性手术中做出决策,并降低不满意结果的风险。

证据等级 IV:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验