School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Jan;25(1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1671314. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
While dementia can negatively affect communication, positive interactions can be facilitated by the conversation partners of people with dementia. There are few assessment tools designed to evaluate the support provided by the conversation partner and the resulting participation of the person with dementia. This study reports on an adaptation of the Measure of Support in Conversation (MSC) and Measure of Participation in Conversation (MPC) scales for use with people with dementia and their conversation partners (the MSC Dementia and MPC Dementia, respectively) and investigates the inter-and intra-rater reliability of these adapted measures.
The MSC-D and MPC-D scales were adapted from the original MSC and MPC scales to reflect current knowledge of communication and interaction involving people with dementia. Audio recordings of a total of 25 casual conversations, lasting 5-10 min, between a person with dementia and familiar aged care staff were independently rated by two raters to investigate inter-rater reliability and by one rater on two separate occasions to investigate intra-rater reliability.
ICC analyses on the MSC-D indicated good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.718-0.812) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.628-0.760). The MPC-D had excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.904-0.945) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.925-0.957). 93.6% of all ratings were within 0.5 of each other on a nine point scale from 0 to 4.
The results provide preliminary support for the use of these adapted scales. Further research is required to investigate the validity and reliability of these scales using video recordings and across a wider range of communication genres.
痴呆症可能会对交流产生负面影响,但痴呆症患者的对话伙伴可以促进积极的互动。目前很少有评估工具用于评估对话伙伴提供的支持以及由此导致的痴呆症患者的参与度。本研究报告了对用于痴呆症患者及其对话伙伴的“对话支持测量(MSC)”和“对话参与测量(MPC)”量表的改编(分别为 MSC 痴呆症和 MPC 痴呆症),并调查了这些改编量表的跨评估者和内部评估者可靠性。
MSC-D 和 MPC-D 量表是从原始的 MSC 和 MPC 量表改编而来的,以反映当前关于涉及痴呆症患者的沟通和互动的知识。共有 25 次 5-10 分钟的随意对话的音频记录,由一名痴呆症患者和熟悉的老年护理人员进行,由两名评估者进行独立评估,以调查跨评估者可靠性,由一名评估者在两次不同的时间进行评估,以调查内部评估者可靠性。
MSC-D 的 ICC 分析表明,跨评估者可靠性良好(ICC = 0.718-0.812),内部评估者可靠性良好(ICC = 0.628-0.760)。MPC-D 的跨评估者可靠性非常好(ICC = 0.904-0.945),内部评估者可靠性非常好(ICC = 0.925-0.957)。在 0 到 4 的九点量表上,所有评分中有 93.6%的评分相差在 0.5 以内。
这些结果初步支持使用这些改编的量表。需要进一步的研究,使用视频记录并在更广泛的沟通类型中调查这些量表的有效性和可靠性。