Chueh Ju-Yu, Kang Dong-Hun, Kim Byung Moon, Gounis Matthew J
Department of Radiology, New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery and Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020 Jan;63(1):14-25. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0114. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
Proximal flow control achieved with a balloon guide catheter (BGC) during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is reviewed in this article. In clinical practice, BGCs offer a multi-faceted approach for clot retrieval by creating proximal flow arrest, reducing embolic burden, and shortening procedure time. Evaluation of frontline thrombectomy procedures with BGCs revealed advantages of combined use over the conventional guide catheter (CGC), notably in the significant reduction of distal emboli to both the affected and previously unaffected territories. Recently, new measures of early and complete reperfusion at first thrombectomy pass have been identified as independent predictors of improved outcomes, which were consistently demonstrated with use of BGC as a safe and effective option to minimize number of passes during intervention. Prior randomized controlled trials reported the positive correlation between BGC-treated patients and a lower risk of mortality as well as shortened procedure time. While BGC use is more common in stent retriever-mediated mechanical thrombectomy, preliminary data has shown the potential benefit of device application during contact aspiration thrombectomy to achieve successful recanalization. However, the question of which major endovascular strategy reigns superior as a frontline remains to be answered. Along with clinical case assessments, BGC performance during in-vitro simulation was analyzed to further understand mechanisms for optimization of thrombectomy technique.
本文回顾了在急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗期间使用球囊导引导管(BGC)实现近端血流控制的情况。在临床实践中,BGC通过实现近端血流阻断、减轻栓塞负荷和缩短手术时间,为取栓提供了多方面的方法。对使用BGC的一线血栓切除术的评估显示,与传统导引导管(CGC)联合使用具有优势,特别是在显著减少向患侧和先前未受影响区域的远端栓子方面。最近,首次血栓切除术通过时早期和完全再灌注的新指标已被确定为改善预后的独立预测因素,使用BGC作为一种安全有效的选择以尽量减少干预期间的通过次数,这一点得到了一致证明。先前的随机对照试验报告了接受BGC治疗的患者与较低的死亡风险以及较短的手术时间之间存在正相关。虽然BGC在支架取栓器介导的机械血栓切除术中使用更为常见,但初步数据显示了在接触抽吸血栓切除术中应用该装置以实现成功再通的潜在益处。然而,哪种主要血管内策略作为一线治疗更具优势的问题仍有待解答。除了临床病例评估外,还分析了BGC在体外模拟中的性能,以进一步了解优化血栓切除术技术的机制。