From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (O.N., D.W., H.M.H., J.S., T.S., F.S.M., M.W.)
From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (O.N., D.W., H.M.H., J.S., T.S., F.S.M., M.W.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2077-2081. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5829. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
Blood flow management in the carotid artery during mechanical thrombectomy is crucial for safety and effectiveness. There is an ongoing discussion about whether balloon-guide catheters or large-bore sheaths are needed for effective flow management. We compared general flow characteristics of proximal aspiration through a large-bore sheath and a balloon-guide catheter in a porcine in vivo model.
We investigated blood flow in a porcine common carotid artery with and without aspiration (VacLok syringe and Penumbra pump, Pump MAX) through an 8F-long sheath and an 8F balloon-guide catheter. Blood hemodynamics were assessed via continuous duplex sonography.
Average vessel diameter and baseline blood flow were 4.4 ± 0.2 mm and 244 ± 20 mL/min, respectively. For the 8F sheath, pump aspiration resulted in a significant flow reduction (225 ± 25 mL/min, < .001), but with a persisting antegrade stream. Manual aspiration resulted in collapse of the vessel in 2 of 7 measurements and oscillatory flow with antegrade systolic and retrograde diastolic components in the remaining 5 measurements. Net flow was antegrade (52 ± 44 mL/min) in 3 and retrograde (-95 ± 52 mL/min) in the remaining 2 measurements. For balloon-guide catheters, balloon inflation always resulted in flow arrest. Additional pump or manual aspiration resulted in significant flow reversal of -1100 ± 230 and -468 ± 46 mL/min, respectively (both, < .001).
Only balloon-guide catheters allow reliable blood flow arrest and flow reversal in combination with aspiration via syringes or high-flow pump systems. Aspiration through an 8F sheath results in either collapse of the vessel or oscillatory flow, which can result in a net antegrade or retrograde stream.
在机械血栓切除术中,颈动脉内的血流管理对于安全性和有效性至关重要。目前正在讨论是否需要球囊引导导管或大口径鞘管来进行有效的血流管理。我们在猪活体模型中比较了通过大口径鞘管和球囊引导导管进行近端抽吸的一般血流特征。
我们通过 8F 长鞘管和 8F 球囊引导导管,在猪的颈总动脉中进行了有抽吸(VacLok 注射器和 Penumbra 泵,Pump MAX)和无抽吸的血流研究。通过连续双功超声评估血液动力学。
平均血管直径和基线血流分别为 4.4 ± 0.2mm 和 244 ± 20mL/min。对于 8F 鞘管,泵抽吸导致血流显著减少(225 ± 25mL/min, <.001),但仍有向前的血流。手动抽吸导致 7 次测量中的 2 次血管塌陷,5 次测量中的剩余 5 次测量中出现振荡血流,伴有向前收缩和向后舒张成分。净血流在 3 次测量中为向前(52 ± 44mL/min),在剩余的 2 次测量中为向后(-95 ± 52mL/min)。对于球囊引导导管,球囊充气始终导致血流停止。额外的泵或手动抽吸导致血流反转分别为-1100 ± 230 和-468 ± 46mL/min(均 <.001)。
只有球囊引导导管在结合注射器或高流量泵系统抽吸时才能可靠地停止和反转血流。通过 8F 鞘管抽吸会导致血管塌陷或振荡血流,从而导致净向前或向后血流。