Suppr超能文献

新辅助放化疗后临床完全缓解的食管癌患者行主动监测与即刻手术的比较:一项多中心倾向匹配研究。

Active Surveillance Versus Immediate Surgery in Clinically Complete Responders After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Matched Study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):1009-1016. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003636.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer and clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery.

BACKGROUND

Since nearly one-third of patients with esophageal cancer show pathologically complete response after nCRT according to CROSS regimen, the oncological benefit of immediate surgery in cCR is topic of debate.

METHODS

Patients with cCR based on endoscopic biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration initially declining or accepting immediate surgery after nCRT were identified between 2011 and 2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), rate and timing of distant dissemination, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Some 98 patients with cCR were identified: 31 in the active surveillance- and 67 in the immediate surgery group with median followup of survivors of 27.7 and 34.8 months, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 2 comparable groups (n = 29 in both groups). Patients undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery had a 3-year OS of 77% and 55% (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.14-1.20, P = 0.104), respectively. The 3-year PFS was 60% and 54% (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.44-2.67, P = 0.871), respectively. Patients undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery had a comparable distant dissemination rate (both groups 28%), radical resection rate (both groups 100%), and severity of postoperative complications (Clav- ien-Dindo grade ≥ 3: 43% vs 45%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, OS and PFS in patients with cCR undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery were not significantly different. Active surveillance with postponed surgery for recurrent disease was not associated with a higher distant dissemination rate or more severe adverse postoperative outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了接受新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后临床完全缓解(cCR)的食管癌患者接受主动监测或立即手术的治疗结果。

背景

根据 CROSS 方案,近三分之一的食管癌患者在 nCRT 后表现出病理完全缓解,因此立即手术在 cCR 中的肿瘤学获益是一个有争议的话题。

方法

在 2011 年至 2018 年间,我们确定了基于内镜活检和内镜超声检查及细针抽吸的 cCR 患者,这些患者最初拒绝或接受 nCRT 后立即手术。主要终点是总生存(OS)。次要终点是无进展生存(PFS)、远处转移的发生率和时间以及术后结果。

结果

共确定了 98 例 cCR 患者:主动监测组 31 例,立即手术组 67 例,幸存者的中位随访时间分别为 27.7 个月和 34.8 个月。倾向评分匹配后得到 2 个可比组(每组 29 例)。接受主动监测或立即手术的患者 3 年 OS 率分别为 77%和 55%(HR 0.41;95%CI 0.14-1.20,P=0.104),3 年 PFS 率分别为 60%和 54%(HR 1.08;95%CI 0.44-2.67,P=0.871)。接受主动监测或立即手术的患者远处转移率相当(两组均为 28%),根治性切除率相当(两组均为 100%),术后并发症严重程度相当(Clavien-Dindo 分级≥3:43%与 45%,分别)。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,接受主动监测或立即手术的 cCR 患者的 OS 和 PFS 无显著差异。对复发疾病进行主动监测和推迟手术并不会导致更高的远处转移率或更严重的术后不良后果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验