• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of quality of life in patients with oral cancer after mandibular resection: Comparing no reconstruction, reconstruction with plate, and reconstruction with flap.下颌骨切除术后口腔癌患者生活质量评估:无重建、钢板重建与皮瓣重建的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(41):e17431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017431.
2
Health-related quality of life after segmental resection of the lateral mandible: Free fibula flap versus plate reconstruction.下颌骨外侧节段性切除术后的健康相关生活质量:游离腓骨瓣与钢板重建的比较。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;43(5):658-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
3
Evaluation of alloplastic mandibular reconstruction combined with a radial forearm flap compared with a vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap as the first approach to two-stage rehabilitation in advanced oral cancer.评估异体下颌骨重建联合桡侧前臂皮瓣与股外侧肌皮瓣作为晚期口腔癌两阶段修复的首选方法。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;57(5):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
A small number of residual teeth after the mandibular resection of oral cancer is associated with titanium reconstruction plate exposure.口腔癌下颌骨切除术后少量残留牙齿与钛重建板暴露有关。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jun 7;5(5):469-475. doi: 10.1002/cre2.208. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
Mandibular reconstruction in elderly patients.老年患者的下颌骨重建
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;117(8):1744-1751. doi: 10.1002/jso.25059. Epub 2018 May 14.
6
Comparison of reconstruction plate and double flap for reconstruction of an extensive mandibular defect.重建板与双瓣在重建大面积下颌骨缺损中的比较。
Microsurgery. 2012 Sep;32(6):452-7. doi: 10.1002/micr.21976. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
7
Quality of life in oral cancer patients--effects of mandible resection and socio-cultural aspects.口腔癌患者的生活质量--下颌骨切除的影响和社会文化方面。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;40(1):24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
8
[Reconstruction of mandibular defect caused by resection of oral carcinoma with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and ti-plate system].[应用胸大肌肌皮瓣及钛板系统修复口腔癌切除术后下颌骨缺损]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Oct;19(10):793-5.
9
Osteocutaneous free flaps for mandibular reconstruction: systematic review of their frequency of use and a preliminary quality of life comparison.用于下颌骨重建的骨皮瓣游离组织移植:对其使用频率的系统评价及生活质量的初步比较
J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Dec;128(12):1034-43. doi: 10.1017/S0022215114002278. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
10
Utility of Superiorly Based Masseter Muscle Flap for Postablative Retromaxillary Reconstruction.基于咬肌上蒂肌瓣在颌后区切除术后重建中的应用
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan;75(1):224.e1-224.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of the surgical execution of virtually planned deep circumflex iliac artery flaps and their appropriateness for masticatory rehabilitation.虚拟计划的旋髂深动脉皮瓣手术执行的准确性及其在咀嚼康复中的适宜性。
Head Face Med. 2024 Aug 13;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00444-y.
2
Longitudinal Assessment of the Quality of Life in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.口腔鳞状细胞癌患者生活质量的纵向评估
Cureus. 2024 May 19;16(5):e60596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60596. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Development of a universal cutting guide for raising deep circumflex iliac artery flaps.开发一种通用的切割导板,用于提高旋髂深动脉皮瓣。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024 Sep;19(9):1875-1882. doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03144-9. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
4
The Perfect Timing-Immediate versus Delayed Microvascular Reconstruction of the Mandible.最佳时机——下颌骨微血管重建的即刻与延迟对比
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;16(5):974. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050974.
5
On a pathway to resigned acceptance: Patients' experiences of living with symptom clusters in oral cancer.在无奈接受的道路上:口腔癌患者经历症状群的体验。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Feb;62:102263. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102263. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
6
Oral Health Management and Rehabilitation for Patients with Oral Cancer: A Narrative Review.口腔癌患者的口腔健康管理与康复:一项叙述性综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 23;10(5):960. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050960.
7
Quality of Life in Patients With Tongue Cancer After Surgical Treatment: A 12-Month Prospective Study.舌癌患者手术治疗后的生活质量:一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Feb 23;14(2):e22511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22511. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Bone Union of Osseous Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer in Mandibular Reconstruction.下颌骨重建中游离骨微血管组织瓣的骨愈合
OTO Open. 2022 Jan 12;6(1):2473974X211070258. doi: 10.1177/2473974X211070258. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
9
Health-Related Quality of Life in Oral Cancer Patients: Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal of Investigated Determinants.口腔癌患者的健康相关生活质量:对已调查决定因素的范围综述与批判性评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;13(17):4398. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174398.
10
Intensive Care as an Independent Risk Factor for Infection after Reconstruction and Augmentation with Autologous Bone Grafts in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.重症监护作为颅颌面外科自体骨移植重建与增强术后感染的独立危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 9;10(12):2560. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122560.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life after microvascular mandibular reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis-A prospective study.放射性骨坏死微血管下颌骨重建术后的生活质量——一项前瞻性研究。
Head Neck. 2019 Jul;41(7):2225-2230. doi: 10.1002/hed.25681. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Results of a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving neck dissection in clinically node-negative squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity.一项关于 IIb 级保留颈部清扫术在临床淋巴结阴性口腔鳞癌中应用的随机对照试验结果。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 8;16(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1518-z.
3
Impact of reconstructive microsurgery on patients with cancer of the head and neck: a prospective study of quality of life, particularly in older patients.重建显微外科手术对头颈癌患者的影响:一项关于生活质量的前瞻性研究,特别是针对老年患者。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Nov;56(9):830-834. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Head and neck cancer, quality of life, and determinant factors: a novel approach using decision tree analysis.头颈癌、生活质量及决定因素:一种运用决策树分析的新方法
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Dec;126(6):486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.07.055. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Long-term quality of life and psycho-social outcomes after oropharyngeal cancer surgery and radial forearm free-flap reconstruction: A GETTEC prospective multicentric study.口咽癌手术及游离桡侧前臂皮瓣重建术后的长期生活质量及心理社会结局:一项GETTEC前瞻性多中心研究。
Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;27(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
6
Electrochemotherapy - possible benefits and limitations to its use in the head and neck region.电化学疗法——其在头颈部区域应用的潜在益处与局限性
Acta Otolaryngol. 2015 Jan;135(1):90-5. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.947655.
7
Predicting depression and quality of life among long-term head and neck cancer survivors.预测长期头颈癌幸存者的抑郁状况和生活质量。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jan;152(1):91-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599814557772. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
8
Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after oncologic surgery and microvascular reconstruction in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer.口腔或口咽癌患者肿瘤切除手术及微血管重建术后的长期功能预后及生活质量
Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Oct;134(10):1086-93. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.913809. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
9
Measuring quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: Update of the EORTC QLQ-H&N Module, Phase III.测量头颈癌患者的生活质量:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-H&N模块第三阶段更新
Head Neck. 2015 Sep;37(9):1358-67. doi: 10.1002/hed.23762. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
10
Oral complications and management strategies for patients undergoing cancer therapy.癌症治疗患者的口腔并发症及管理策略
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 8;2014:581795. doi: 10.1155/2014/581795. eCollection 2014.

下颌骨切除术后口腔癌患者生活质量评估:无重建、钢板重建与皮瓣重建的比较。

Evaluation of quality of life in patients with oral cancer after mandibular resection: Comparing no reconstruction, reconstruction with plate, and reconstruction with flap.

作者信息

Davudov Mahammad M, Harirchi Iraj, Arabkheradmand Ali, Garajei Ata, Mahmudzadeh Habibollah, Shirkhoda Mohammad, Motiee-Langroudi Maziar, Mirzajani Zoheir, Zebardast Jayran, Montazeri Ali

机构信息

Cancer Research Center of Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(41):e17431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017431.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000017431
PMID:31593097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6799791/
Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess and compare quality of life in patients with advanced oral cavity tumors after mandibular resection in 3 groups (no reconstruction, reconstruction with plate, and reconstruction with flap) at the Cancer Institute, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Quality of life was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer head and neck cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire-35 items. The comparison was tested using Kurskal-Wallis analysis. All 120 patients were entered into the study. The mean age of patients was 48.5 (standard deviation = 18.1) years. Patients presented with advanced stage of the disease and underwent mandibular resection with no reconstruction (n = 40), reconstruction with plate (n = 41), and reconstruction with flap (n = 39). The findings showed that in general, there were no statistically significant differences in quality of life among 3 groups except for speech problem (P = .4), dry mouth (P = .03), and feeling ill (P = .04). Although there were no significant differences in quality of life among patients in 3 groups, overall patients who received reconstruction with flap reported better functioning and fewer symptoms. Those who did not receive any reconstruction reported the worse conditions.

摘要

这项横断面研究旨在评估和比较德黑兰医科大学附属癌症研究所中3组(未进行重建、使用钢板重建和使用皮瓣重建)晚期口腔肿瘤患者在下颌骨切除术后的生活质量。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织头颈癌特异性生活质量问卷(35项)来测量生活质量。采用Kruskal-Wallis分析进行比较检验。所有120名患者均纳入研究。患者的平均年龄为48.5岁(标准差=18.1)。患者均为疾病晚期,接受了下颌骨切除术,其中未进行重建的有40例,使用钢板重建的有41例,使用皮瓣重建的有39例。研究结果表明,总体而言,除了言语问题(P=0.4)、口干(P=0.03)和感觉不适(P=0.04)外,3组患者的生活质量在统计学上没有显著差异。尽管3组患者的生活质量没有显著差异,但总体而言,接受皮瓣重建的患者功能更好,症状更少。未接受任何重建的患者情况最差。