• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥尤卡坦半岛家猪的血清学阳性率表明感染率较低。

Mat Seroprevalence Infers Low Rates of in Domestic Pigs from Yucatan, Mexico.

作者信息

Cubas-Atienzar Ana Isabel, Hide Geoff, Smith Judith Elisabeth

机构信息

Biomedical Research Center, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, U.K.

出版信息

J Parasitol. 2019 Oct;105(5):738-747.

PMID:31593524
Abstract

is a zoonotic parasite of worldwide distribution. The consumption of infected pork meat has been suggested to be an important source for human infection in the tropical area of Yucatan, Mexico. We performed a cross-sectional study of 12 farms across the state to investigate the seroprevalence of infection in domestic pigs. In total, 632 samples were obtained from 2 different environmental zones (tropical deciduous low forest and tropical sub-deciduous medium forest) and 2 abattoirs. The modified agglutination test (MAT) was used to assess the seroprevalence of in pigs and to evaluate 2 globally used serological tests, the Dye test (DT) and ID Screen® ELISA multi-species, and a commercial ELISA kit (Human Toxo IgG, Human-diagnostics), which is widely used locally in this geographical area. The overall prevalence obtained with the MAT (cut-off ≥1:25) among the 632 pigs was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.6-2.7%). The seroprevalence obtained for the different age groups was 0.6%, 0.7%, 1.8%, and 6.8% among 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and ≥5-mo-old pigs. This increase in the seroprevalence was statistically significant for the 2 older groups (odds ratio [OR] 3.9-7.1, < 0.05) in comparison with younger groups. DT at >4 IU dilution had a perfect agreement and 100% of sensitivity and specificity when compared with the MAT. Although ID Screen® had only a fair agreement (κ = 0.389) with the MAT, the McNemar test showed that the results of these tests were comparable ( = 0.29). The Human Toxo ELISA showed no agreement with MAT, ID Screen®, and DT (κ = 0.000-0.023, McNemar < 0.05). This ELISA was lacking in specificity, accuracy, and precision; hence, we do not recommend its use for diagnosis in pig serum.

摘要

是一种分布于全球的人畜共患寄生虫。在墨西哥尤卡坦半岛的热带地区,食用受感染的猪肉被认为是人类感染的重要来源。我们对该州的12个农场进行了一项横断面研究,以调查家猪感染的血清阳性率。总共从2个不同的环境区域(热带落叶低地森林和热带次落叶中林)和2个屠宰场采集了632份样本。采用改良凝集试验(MAT)评估猪的血清阳性率,并评估2种全球使用的血清学检测方法,即染料试验(DT)和ID Screen® ELISA多物种检测,以及一种在该地理区域本地广泛使用的商业ELISA试剂盒(人弓形虫IgG,Human-diagnostics)。在632头猪中,MAT(临界值≥1:25)得出的总体阳性率为1.4%(95%可信区间,0.6 - 2.7%)。不同年龄组的血清阳性率在2 - 3月龄、3 - 4月龄、4 - 5月龄和≥5月龄的猪中分别为0.6%、0.7%、1.8%和6.8%。与较年轻组相比,两个较年长组的血清阳性率增加具有统计学意义(优势比[OR] 3.9 - 7.1,P < 0.05)。与MAT相比,稀释度>4 IU的DT具有完全一致性,敏感性和特异性均为100%。虽然ID Screen®与MAT仅具有中等一致性(κ = 0.389),但McNemar检验表明这些检测结果具有可比性(P = 0.29)。人弓形虫ELISA与MAT、ID Screen®和DT均无一致性(κ = 0.000 - 0.023,McNemar P < 0.05)。该ELISA缺乏特异性、准确性和精密度;因此,我们不建议将其用于猪血清中弓形虫的诊断。

相似文献

1
Mat Seroprevalence Infers Low Rates of in Domestic Pigs from Yucatan, Mexico.墨西哥尤卡坦半岛家猪的血清学阳性率表明感染率较低。
J Parasitol. 2019 Oct;105(5):738-747.
2
High prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in domestic pigs in Oaxaca State, Mexico.墨西哥瓦哈卡州家猪中弓形虫抗体的高流行率。
J Parasitol. 2012 Dec;98(6):1248-50. doi: 10.1645/GE-3184.1. Epub 2012 May 4.
3
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic pigs in Durango State, Mexico.墨西哥杜兰戈州家猪弓形虫感染的血清流行率。
J Parasitol. 2011 Aug;97(4):616-9. doi: 10.1645/GE-2755.1. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
4
Comparison of different commercial serological tests for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in serum of naturally exposed pigs.用于检测自然感染猪血清中弓形虫抗体的不同商业血清学检测方法的比较
Zoonoses Public Health. 2015 Mar;62(2):119-24. doi: 10.1111/zph.12122. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
5
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pigs from Vietnam.越南猪群中弓形虫的血清流行率。
J Parasitol. 2007 Aug;93(4):951-2. doi: 10.1645/GE-1163R.1.
6
Seroprevalence and correlates of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic pigs in Veracruz State, Mexico.墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州家猪弓形虫感染的血清流行率及其相关因素
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2014 Apr;46(4):705-9. doi: 10.1007/s11250-014-0551-3. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
7
Low seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in feral pigs from a remote island lacking cats.来自一个没有猫的偏远岛屿的野猪中弓形虫血清阳性率较低。
J Parasitol. 1997 Oct;83(5):839-41.
8
Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Sweden and evaluation of ELISA test performance.瑞典野猪(Sus scrofa)中弓形虫血清流行率及酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测性能评估
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Jul;143(9):1913-21. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814002891. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii in domestic pigs from Spain.西班牙家猪中弓形虫的血清流行率及相关危险因素
Parasitol Int. 2010 Sep;59(3):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
10
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Latvia.拉脱维亚家猪(Sus scrofa domestica)和野猪(Sus scrofa)中弓形虫的血清流行率。
J Parasitol. 2013 Feb;99(1):44-7. doi: 10.1645/GE-3187.1. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Seroprevalence of in wild boars () hunted in Ukraine.乌克兰猎获的野猪( )中的血清阳性率。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,括号里应有具体内容未给出)
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2023 Dec 29;23:100901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100901. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Seroprevalence and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic pigs intended for human consumption in Cuba.在古巴,用于人类消费的家猪中弓形虫的血清流行率和遗传特征。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2023 Mar;70(2):125-133. doi: 10.1111/zph.13010. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Diagnostic value of recombinant nanoluciferase fused Toxoplasma gondii antigens in Luciferase-linked Antibody Capture Assay (LACA) for Toxoplasma infection in pigs.
重组纳米荧光素酶融合弓形虫抗原在 Luciferase-linked Antibody Capture Assay (LACA) 中对猪弓形虫感染的诊断价值。
J Vet Med Sci. 2022 Jul 1;84(7):905-913. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0099. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
Low Prevalence of Antibodies Against in Chinese Populations.在中国人群中,针对 的抗体的低流行率。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Jun 23;10:302. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00302. eCollection 2020.