J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Oct 7;29(7):897-903. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0496. Print 2020 Sep 1.
This study investigates the ability of subjects to differentiate the strength of back muscle contraction with and without feedback information on force produced under fatigue and nonfatigue conditions.
Controlled laboratory study.
Research laboratory environment.
A group of 52 healthy young men participated in the study.
Subjects self-estimated 50% of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction of back muscles either on their own volition or on the basis of information about the actual force, before and after the Sørensen fatigue test.
The force was measured by means of the FiTRO Back Dynamometer.
The self-estimated 50% maximal voluntary isometric contraction was significantly higher than the one calculated from maximal voluntary isometric contraction during 10 trials in 2 repeated sessions (8.3% and 10.0%, P < .05). However, when feedback on the force produced was provided, significantly higher values were observed during an initial trial in both sessions (8.5%, P = .04 and 12.1%, P = .01). Subjects were able to estimate the target force during the following trials. Fatigue induced a decrease in peak force (7.7%, P = .04), whereas the ability to regulate the prescribed force was not compromised. Constant error was lower with than without force feedback during both measurements (2.15% and 6.85%; 3.06% and 8.56%). However, constant and variable errors were greater under fatigue than nonfatigue conditions (8.43% and 5.55%; 0.41% and 0.37%). Similarly, root mean square error decreased with force feedback (from 6.88% to 3.48% and from 8.74% to 5.09%) and increased under fatigue (from 5.87% to 8.67%).
These findings indicate that force feedback plays a role in the differentiation of the strength of back muscle contraction, regardless of fatigue. It contributes to a more precise regulation of force produced during voluntary isometric contraction of back muscles. This promising method awaits further experimentation to be applied for individuals with low back pain.
本研究旨在探讨在疲劳和非疲劳条件下,受试者在有和没有反馈信息的情况下,区分背部肌肉收缩力的能力。
对照实验室研究。
研究实验室环境。
一组 52 名健康年轻男性参加了这项研究。
受试者在 Sørensen 疲劳测试前后,自主估计或基于实际力的信息,自愿估计背部肌肉 50%的最大等长收缩力。
使用 FiTRO 背部测力计测量力。
自主估计的 50%最大等长收缩力明显高于 2 次重复测量的 10 次最大等长收缩力的计算值(8.3%和 10.0%,P<.05)。然而,当提供力反馈时,在 2 次测量的初始试验中观察到的数值明显更高(8.5%,P=.04 和 12.1%,P=.01)。受试者能够在后续试验中估计目标力。疲劳导致峰值力下降(7.7%,P=.04),但调节规定力的能力并未受损。在 2 次测量中,恒误差在有和没有力反馈时均较低(2.15%和 6.85%;3.06%和 8.56%)。然而,在疲劳和非疲劳条件下,恒误差和变误差均较大(8.43%和 5.55%;0.41%和 0.37%)。同样,均方根误差随着力反馈的增加而降低(从 6.88%降至 3.48%和从 8.74%降至 5.09%),而在疲劳时增加(从 5.87%增至 8.67%)。
这些发现表明,力反馈在区分背部肌肉收缩力方面起着作用,无论疲劳与否。它有助于更精确地调节背部肌肉自愿等长收缩时产生的力。这种很有前景的方法有待进一步实验,以便应用于腰痛患者。