Meienberger N, Anzengruber F, Amruthalingam L, Christen R, Koller T, Maul J T, Pouly M, Djamei V, Navarini A A
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):1362-1368. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16002. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Assessment of psoriasis severity is strongly observer-dependent, and objective assessment tools are largely missing. The increasing number of patients receiving highly expensive therapies that are reimbursed only for moderate-to-severe psoriasis motivates the development of higher quality assessment tools.
To establish an accurate and objective psoriasis assessment method based on segmenting images by machine learning technology.
In this retrospective, non-interventional, single-centred, interdisciplinary study of diagnostic accuracy, 259 standardized photographs of Caucasian patients were assessed and typical psoriatic lesions were labelled. Two hundred and three of those were used to train and validate an assessment algorithm which was then tested on the remaining 56 photographs. The results of the algorithm assessment were compared with manually marked area, as well as with the affected area determined by trained dermatologists.
Algorithm assessment achieved accuracy of more than 90% in 77% of the images and differed on average 5.9% from manually marked areas. The difference between algorithm-predicted and photograph-based estimated areas by physicians was 8.1% on average.
The study shows the potential of the evaluated technology. In contrast to the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), it allows for objective evaluation and should therefore be developed further as an alternative method to human assessment.
银屑病严重程度的评估很大程度上依赖观察者,且客观评估工具严重缺失。越来越多的患者接受仅适用于中重度银屑病且费用高昂的治疗,这推动了更高质量评估工具的开发。
基于机器学习技术对图像进行分割,建立一种准确、客观的银屑病评估方法。
在这项关于诊断准确性的回顾性、非干预性、单中心、跨学科研究中,对259张白种人患者的标准化照片进行评估,并标记典型银屑病皮损。其中203张照片用于训练和验证评估算法,然后在其余56张照片上进行测试。将算法评估结果与手动标记面积以及由训练有素的皮肤科医生确定的受累面积进行比较。
算法评估在77%的图像中准确率超过90%,与手动标记面积的平均差异为5.9%。算法预测面积与医生基于照片估计面积之间的平均差异为8.1%。
该研究显示了所评估技术的潜力。与银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)不同,它允许进行客观评估,因此应作为人类评估的替代方法进一步开发。