Man David W K, Tsang Walter S F, Lu Erin Yiqing, Tsang Hector W H
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Dec;66(6):690-699. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12608. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
High-quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science.
On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h-indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions.
Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h-indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h-index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25.
Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.
高质量研究是职业治疗和物理治疗的基础。一项关于不同西方和亚洲国家/地区职业治疗与物理治疗学者研究生产力的文献计量学研究,能够呈现康复科学当前的研究成果概况。
基于对西方国家康复研究主导作用的理解以及对亚洲职业治疗与物理治疗学者所取得成就的认可,当前这项文献计量学研究考察了来自四个西方国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、美国和英国)以及五个亚洲国家/地区(中国香港、日本、中国台湾、新加坡和韩国)的职业治疗和物理治疗教授及副教授的研究生产力。通过在线检索这些学者的h指数并进行汇总,以量化机构及国家/地区的研究生产力。
澳大利亚、加拿大、中国香港和美国被确定为职业治疗与物理治疗研究生产力较高的国家/地区。各机构根据其教授和副教授的h指数中位数进行排名;拥有职业治疗项目的前20个高产机构的h指数中位数为17.5或更高,而拥有物理治疗项目的前20个机构的基准为25。
澳大利亚、加拿大、中国香港和美国的教授及副教授在职业治疗与物理治疗研究方面成果丰硕。教职员工数量和大学合作关系被认为对研究成果很重要。文中还提供了不同合作层面的建议。