Suppr超能文献

比较评估受除草剂暴露影响的陆生植物营养和生殖物种终点及其潜在的环境影响:综述。

Comparative Assessment of Vegetative and Reproductive Terrestrial Plant Species Endpoints from Exposure to Herbicides and Potential Environmental Implications: A Review.

机构信息

tier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020 Mar;16(2):166-183. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4218. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

Abstract

To investigate whether vegetative endpoints are protective of reproductive endpoints in terrestrial plant risk assessments (RAs) for authorization of plant protection products (PPPs), we assessed differences in sensitivity to herbicides between these parameters. Published literature and unpublished proprietary data generated for the registration of PPPs were used to compile a database. If reproductive endpoints were systematically more sensitive than the vegetative endpoints on which regulatory decisions are presently based, a concern could be raised about the protectiveness of the current RA process. Vegetative and reproductive endpoints were assessed considering further potentially relevant parameters. Reproductive endpoints were compared with vegetative endpoints of juvenile plants or with those of mature plants. Direct comparison by substance-species combination proved to be most adequate and was used to calculate quotients by effect level. In addition, we assessed the spread between different effect levels, estimating by which factor the conservatism would increase if effect rate (ER)50 endpoints were replaced by ER25 or ER10 endpoints with otherwise unchanged test parameters. Reproductive endpoints were found to be similarly sensitive as vegetative endpoints derived in nontarget terrestrial plant (NTTP) studies conducted following Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) or US Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) guidelines. A switch from vegetative to reproductive endpoints would therefore not significantly change the conservatism (less than a factor of 1.5), whereas the change from ER50 to ER10 would (by a factor of ~5 to 6). However, because ecotoxicological tests on terrestrial plants bear intrinsic high variability that prevents the reliable detection of effects at the 10% effect level, ER10 endpoints are not a reliable basis for RA. No particular family, genus, or species with clusters of distinctly insensitive vegetative and sensitive reproductive endpoints could be identified that would call for regular testing of reproductive endpoints. Also, from the data set available, no specific herbicidal modes of action could be singled out for acting particularly on reproductive endpoints. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:166-183. © 2019 SETAC.

摘要

为了研究在植物保护产品(PPPs)登记的陆地植物风险评估(RA)中,营养生长终点是否对生殖终点具有保护作用,我们评估了这些参数之间对除草剂敏感性的差异。使用已发表的文献和未公开的专有数据来汇编数据库。如果生殖终点比目前基于监管决策的营养生长终点更敏感,那么就有可能对当前 RA 过程的保护作用提出担忧。评估了营养生长和生殖终点,并考虑了其他潜在的相关参数。将生殖终点与幼年植物或成熟植物的营养生长终点进行了比较。通过物质-物种组合进行的直接比较被证明是最合适的,并用于按效应水平计算商数。此外,我们评估了不同效应水平之间的差异,估计如果用效应率(ER)50 终点代替 ER25 或 ER10 终点,而测试参数不变,保守性会增加多少倍。生殖终点与按照经济合作与发展组织(OECD)或美国化学安全和污染预防办公室(OCSPP)指南进行的非靶标陆地植物(NTTP)研究中得出的营养生长终点具有相似的敏感性。因此,从营养生长终点转换为生殖终点不会显著改变保守性(小于 1.5 倍),而从 ER50 转换为 ER10 则会(约 5 至 6 倍)。然而,由于对陆地植物的生态毒理学测试具有内在的高变异性,无法可靠地检测到 10%效应水平的影响,因此 ER10 终点不是 RA 的可靠基础。没有发现特别不敏感的营养生长和敏感的生殖终点的特定家族、属或物种群,因此不需要定期测试生殖终点。此外,从可用的数据集中,也无法确定特定的除草剂作用模式特别作用于生殖终点。综合环境评估与管理 2020;16:166-183。©2019 SETAC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验