Suppr超能文献

听力损失程度影响生态相关实验室条件下双侧助听器的获益。

Degree of Hearing Loss Affects Bilateral Hearing Aid Benefits in Ecologically Relevant Laboratory Conditions.

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Heuser Hearing Institute, Louisville, KY.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Oct 25;62(10):3834-3850. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Abstract

Purpose Previous evidence supports benefits of bilateral hearing aids, relative to unilateral hearing aid use, in laboratory environments using audio-only (AO) stimuli and relatively simple tasks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bilateral hearing aid benefits in ecologically relevant laboratory settings, with and without visual cues. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between bilateral benefit and clinically viable predictive variables. Method Participants included 32 adult listeners with hearing loss ranging from mild-moderate to severe-profound. Test conditions varied by hearing aid fitting type (unilateral, bilateral) and modality (AO, audiovisual). We tested participants in complex environments that evaluated the following domains: sentence recognition, word recognition, behavioral listening effort, gross localization, and subjective ratings of spatialization. Signal-to-noise ratio was adjusted to provide similar unilateral speech recognition performance in both modalities and across procedures. Results Significant and similar bilateral benefits were measured for both modalities on all tasks except listening effort, where bilateral benefits were not identified in either modality. Predictive variables were related to bilateral benefits in some conditions. With audiovisual stimuli, increasing hearing loss, unaided speech recognition in noise, and unaided subjective spatial ability were significantly correlated with increased benefits for many outcomes. With AO stimuli, these same predictive variables were not significantly correlated with outcomes. No predictive variables were correlated with bilateral benefits for sentence recognition in either modality. Conclusions Hearing aid users can expect significant bilateral hearing aid advantages for ecologically relevant, complex laboratory tests. Although future confirmatory work is necessary, these data indicate the presence of vision strengthens the relationship between bilateral benefits and degree of hearing loss.

摘要

目的 先前的证据支持与单侧助听器相比,双侧助听器在使用纯音频(AO)刺激和相对简单任务的实验室环境中具有优势。本研究的目的是在具有和不具有视觉线索的生态相关实验室环境中评估双侧助听器的优势。此外,我们还评估了双侧受益与临床可行的预测变量之间的关系。 方法 参与者包括 32 名听力损失从轻度到重度到重度的成年听众。测试条件因助听器适配类型(单侧、双侧)和模式(AO、视听)而异。我们在复杂环境中对参与者进行测试,评估以下领域:句子识别、单词识别、行为听力努力、粗略定位和空间化的主观评价。信噪比进行了调整,以便在两种模式和两种程序中都提供相似的单侧语音识别性能。 结果 在所有任务中,除了听力努力之外,两种模式都测量到了显著且相似的双侧优势,而在这两种模式中都没有发现听力努力的双侧优势。在某些条件下,预测变量与双侧优势相关。在视听刺激下,听力损失程度增加、未助听噪声中的语音识别能力以及未助听的主观空间能力与许多结果的收益增加显著相关。在 AO 刺激下,这些相同的预测变量与结果没有显著相关。在两种模式中,句子识别的双侧优势都没有与任何预测变量相关。 结论 对于具有生态相关性的复杂实验室测试,助听器使用者可以预期双侧助听器具有显著的优势。尽管需要进一步的确认性工作,但这些数据表明,视觉的存在增强了双侧受益与听力损失程度之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Degree of Hearing Loss Affects Bilateral Hearing Aid Benefits in Ecologically Relevant Laboratory Conditions.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Oct 25;62(10):3834-3850. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
2
Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):339-52. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000004.
3
An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Feb;30(2):131-144. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17090. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users.
Int J Audiol. 2020 Jul;59(7):524-533. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1761035. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):72-85. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a02274.

引用本文的文献

1
Rehabilitation of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss in Adults in Sweden.
Audiol Res. 2022 Aug 20;12(4):433-444. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12040044.
2
Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.
Semin Hear. 2022 Jul 26;43(2):66-78. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748874. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221083091. doi: 10.1177/23312165221083091.
4
Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Nov 30;15:773427. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.773427. eCollection 2021.
5
Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.
Semin Hear. 2020 Aug;41(3):141-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714744. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):4300-4313. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00156. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
The Effect of Hearing Loss on Localization of Amplitude-Panned and Physical Sources.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Oct;31(9):690-698. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717122. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

2
A Potential Bias in Subjective Ratings of Mental Effort.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Sep 19;61(9):2405-2421. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0451.
5
Binaural Interference and the Effects of Age and Hearing Loss.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):5-13. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15011.
6
Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids.
Trends Hear. 2016 Jul 26;20:2331216516658239. doi: 10.1177/2331216516658239.
7
Effects of Hearing Loss and Cognitive Load on Speech Recognition with Competing Talkers.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 4;7:301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00301. eCollection 2016.
8
The importance of high-frequency audibility with and without visual cues on speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing.
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(11):865-72. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1051666. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
9
Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):183-96. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.
10
Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):339-52. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验