Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Department of Journalism, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Feb 15;37(4):593-599. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6637. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
Although a base level of knowledge is needed to recognize a concussion, knowledge-focused concussion educational materials ignore multifaceted barriers to concussion reporting. We compared student-athlete concussion reporting intentions and behaviors prior to and 1 year after exposure to an intervention or control treatment. We randomly assigned 891 collegiate student-athletes from three universities (Divisions I, II, III) to either the control group (National College Athletic Association [NCAA] Concussion Fact Sheet) or intervention group (theory-based, data-driven, multimedia, simulated concussion reporting module). A final sample of 520 student-athletes (control = 253, intervention = 267, expired eligibility = 189, left university = 182) completed intentions and behaviors surveys immediately prior to and 1 year after the educational intervention, and a second survey to assess the intervention effect. We compared intentions using 2 x 2 mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs). Behaviors and educational intervention effect were assessed using logistic regression models (α = 0.05). The intervention group had significantly improved concussion reporting intentions at 1-year follow-up relative to the control group ( = 0.009), but had similar odds for behaviors. The intervention group had 2.42 times greater odds of rating the module as "very effective," rather than "not effective" relative to the control group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10,5.33). Relative to the control group, the intervention group had significantly greater odds of responding that the concussion education "greatly improved" rather than "did not improve" their knowledge (odds ratio [OR]: 2.49, 95% CI:1.25,4.96), attitudes (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.23,4.03), self-efficacy (OR: 1.95,95% CI: 1.05,3.60), and intentions (OR: 1.86,95% CI: 1.03,3.35). The intervention was more effective at targeting elements of the overall sport culture in a way that substantively improved concussion reporting. We recommend use of this intervention in combination with other evidence-based educational materials.
虽然识别脑震荡需要一定的基础知识,但以知识为重点的脑震荡教育材料却忽略了报告脑震荡的多方面障碍。我们比较了学生运动员在接触干预或对照治疗前后报告脑震荡的意图和行为。我们随机分配了来自三所大学(一、二、三级)的 891 名大学生运动员到对照组(全国大学体育协会[NCAA]脑震荡情况说明书)或干预组(基于理论、数据驱动、多媒体、模拟脑震荡报告模块)。最后一组 520 名学生运动员(对照组=253,干预组=267,资格过期=189,离开大学=182)在教育干预前后立即完成了意图和行为调查,并进行了第二次调查以评估干预效果。我们使用 2x2 混合模型方差分析(ANOVA)比较了意图。使用逻辑回归模型(α=0.05)评估行为和教育干预效果。与对照组相比,干预组在 1 年随访时报告脑震荡的意图明显提高( =0.009),但行为的可能性相似。与对照组相比,干预组将模块评为“非常有效”而不是“无效”的可能性高 2.42 倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.10,5.33)。与对照组相比,干预组更有可能回答脑震荡教育“大大提高”而不是“没有提高”他们的知识(优势比[OR]:2.49,95% CI:1.25,4.96)、态度(OR:2.22,95% CI:1.23,4.03)、自我效能感(OR:1.95,95% CI:1.05,3.60)和意图(OR:1.86,95% CI:1.03,3.35)。该干预措施在针对整体运动文化的各个方面更加有效,实质性地提高了脑震荡报告率。我们建议将这种干预措施与其他基于证据的教育材料结合使用。