Benchmarking comes of age.
作者信息
Robinson Mark D, Vitek Olga
机构信息
Institute of Molecular Life Sciences and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
出版信息
Genome Biol. 2019 Oct 9;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1846-5.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Benchmarking comes of age.
Genome Biol. 2019 Oct 9;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1846-5.
2
Metagenomics: exploring unseen communities.
Nature. 2008 May 29;453(7195):687-90. doi: 10.1038/453687a.
3
Benchmark Dataset for Whole Genome Sequence Compression.
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):1228-1236. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2016.2568186. Epub 2016 May 16.
4
GPAC: benchmarking the sensitivity of genome informatics analysis to genome annotation completeness.
In Silico Biol. 2006;6(1-2):49-60.
5
Benchmarking: contexts and details matter.
Genome Biol. 2017 Jul 5;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1258-3.
6
Rapid innovation in ChIP-seq peak-calling algorithms is outdistancing benchmarking efforts.
Brief Bioinform. 2011 Nov;12(6):626-33. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbq068. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
7
The failure of genomics in biology.
Trends Parasitol. 2014 Jul;30(7):319-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 27.
8
Benchmarking database performance for genomic data.
J Cell Biochem. 2015 Jun;116(6):877-83. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25049.
9
Benchmarking distributed data warehouse solutions for storing genomic variant information.
Database (Oxford). 2017 Jan 1;2017. doi: 10.1093/database/bax049.
10
Teaser: Individualized benchmarking and optimization of read mapping results for NGS data.
Genome Biol. 2015 Oct 22;16:235. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0803-1.
引用本文的文献
1
Assessing the replicability of spatial gene expression using atlas data from the adult mouse brain.
PLoS Biol. 2021 Jul 19;19(7):e3001341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001341. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
On the optimistic performance evaluation of newly introduced bioinformatic methods.
Genome Biol. 2021 May 11;22(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02365-4.
3
ReSeq simulates realistic Illumina high-throughput sequencing data.
Genome Biol. 2021 Feb 19;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02265-7.
4
Benchmarking Quantitative Performance in Label-Free Proteomics.
ACS Omega. 2021 Jan 20;6(4):2494-2504. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04030. eCollection 2021 Feb 2.
本文引用的文献
1
Reproducible biomedical benchmarking in the cloud: lessons from crowd-sourced data challenges.
Genome Biol. 2019 Sep 10;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1794-0.
2
A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Genome Biol. 2019 Sep 9;20(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1795-z.
3
Benchmarking software tools for detecting and quantifying selection in evolve and resequencing studies.
Genome Biol. 2019 Aug 15;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1770-8.
4
A systematic assessment of current genome-scale metabolic reconstruction tools.
Genome Biol. 2019 Aug 7;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1769-1.
5
Benchmarking of alignment-free sequence comparison methods.
Genome Biol. 2019 Jul 25;20(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1755-7.
6
Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
Genome Biol. 2019 Jun 24;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y.
7
Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking.
Genome Biol. 2019 Jun 20;20(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8.
8
A practical guide to methods controlling false discoveries in computational biology.
Genome Biol. 2019 Jun 4;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1716-1.
9
Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing.
Genome Biol. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1720-5.
10
Systematic benchmarking of omics computational tools.
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 27;10(1):1393. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09406-4.
Zotero 插件