Suppr超能文献

英国老年人中性别与居住环境、个人资源及需求满意度对生活质量的交互作用

The Interaction Effect of Gender and Residential Environment, Individual Resources, and Needs Satisfaction on Quality of Life Among Older Adults in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Liu Ben Chi-Pun, Leung Dion Sik-Yee, Warrener Julia

机构信息

University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019 Sep 24;5:2333721419878579. doi: 10.1177/2333721419878579. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

To examine the difference in gender and its impact on selected quality-of-life (QoL) domains of Social Production Function theory among older adults in England. Based on an annual national adult social care service user survey conducted in the United Kingdom in 2016. QoL was assessed by a single-item construct, and independent variables were home design, access to information and local area, self-rated health, perceived pain/discomfort, perceived anxiety/depression, activities of daily living, use and satisfaction of formal and informal care, and demographic variables. A total of 28,955 respondents aged 65+ years were interviewed. Multinomial logistic regression analysis found four interaction effects for predicting a very good/good QoL: (a) Female receiving non-co-residing informal care (odds ratio [OR] = 1.501, < .01), (b) female feeling safe (OR = 1.499, < .01), (c) female feeling satisfied with social contact with people (OR = 1.465, < .05), and (d) female being helped in the use of time (OR = 1.370, < .05). Findings suggest gender differences in QoL as men and women are heterogeneous with different health and disease patterns, health-/help-seeking behaviors, roles and responsibilities, and levels of resilience, needs, risks, and access and control resources. Practitioners should adopt a gender-specific assessment and personalized interventions to promote gender equality, empowerment, and long-term sustainable development for an aging society.

摘要

研究英格兰老年人的性别差异及其对社会生产功能理论中选定生活质量(QoL)领域的影响。基于2016年在英国进行的年度全国成人社会护理服务用户调查。生活质量通过单一项目结构进行评估,自变量包括家庭设计、信息获取与当地情况、自评健康状况、感知到的疼痛/不适、感知到的焦虑/抑郁、日常生活活动、正式和非正式护理的使用及满意度,以及人口统计学变量。共对28955名65岁及以上的受访者进行了访谈。多项逻辑回归分析发现了预测非常好/好的生活质量的四个交互效应:(a)接受非同住非正式护理的女性(优势比[OR]=1.501,<.01),(b)感到安全的女性(OR = 1.499,<.01),(c)对与人的社交接触感到满意的女性(OR = 1.465,<.05),以及(d)在时间利用上得到帮助的女性(OR = 1.370,<.05)。研究结果表明生活质量存在性别差异,因为男性和女性在健康和疾病模式、健康/求助行为、角色和责任以及恢复力、需求、风险、获取和控制资源水平等方面存在异质性。从业者应采用针对性别的评估和个性化干预措施,以促进老龄化社会中的性别平等、赋权和长期可持续发展。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Quality of Life Research: More Than Ever.
J Card Fail. 2016 Nov;22(11):851-852. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验