Use of dimethylxanthine theophylline (SpermMobil) does not affect clinical, obstetric or perinatal outcomes.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the use of a commercially available dimethylxanthine theophylline compound (SpermMobil) for artificial sperm activation would negatively affect clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

Artificial sperm activation (ASA) was used when sperm motility after preparation was low or absent in our clinical standard procedure practice. ICSI cycles using either testicular or ejaculated sperm with concentration smaller than 5 million/ml from August 2012 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed (n = 815) and divided into two groups, a control group where no ASA was needed and the SpermMobil group with ASA.

RESULTS

The fertilization rate was significantly higher in the control group, but pregnancy and implantation rates did not differ significantly. Number of embryos transferred, good quality embryos for ET and number of frozen blastocysts were similar in both groups. Clinical pregnancy loss was significantly reduced in the SpermMobil group, which was reflected in slightly better live birth rates than in the control group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences regarding gestational age, weight, height and z score for singletons or multiples in the SpermMobil (n = 27 and n = 10) or control (n = 144 and n = 67) groups. There were no reports of malformation, perinatal mortality or intensive therapy in the SpermMobil group, whereas in the control group, 12 babies needed intensive care, besides one intrauterine death.

CONCLUSION

The use of SpermMobil in samples with mostly immotile sperm not only facilitates the embryologists work but also optimizes the treatment outcomes for those patients with a bad prognosis. This is the first report of obstetric and perinatal outcomes after applying a theophylline derivative in human clinical use.