Prince Dana M, Rocha Anita, Nurius Paula S
Soc Work Res. 2018 Sep;42(3):169-179. doi: 10.1093/swr/svy016. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
Multiply disadvantaged youths exhibit worse health and academic success than their less disadvantaged peers, possibly due to greater exposure to social status-based discrimination. Models that capture the additive burden of disadvantage in tandem with multiple forms of discrimination are needed to explicate the unique and combined impact of these factors on adolescent health and academic outcomes. In addition, protective factors like positive family and peer relationships may attenuate these relationships. This study used data from the Beyond High School Study ( = 9,658), which looked at the transition to adulthood among senior class cohorts from 12 high schools in western Washington state, to investigate the influence of multiple disadvantage, four types of discrimination, and protective resources on student physical and mental health and school grades. Results show that both increased multiple disadvantage statuses and experienced discrimination are associated with decrements across outcomes; however, effects are attenuated when protective resources are considered. Yet, as disadvantages mount, the buffering effect of peer and family resources are dampened. No interaction was found between experienced discrimination and protective resources on outcomes.
多重弱势青少年比起那些弱势程度较低的同龄人,健康状况更差,学业成就更低,这可能是由于他们更多地遭受基于社会地位的歧视。需要能够同时捕捉弱势的累加负担以及多种形式歧视的模型,来阐明这些因素对青少年健康和学业成果的独特及综合影响。此外,诸如积极的家庭和同伴关系等保护因素可能会减弱这些关联。本研究使用了“高中之后研究”(样本量 = 9658)的数据,该研究考察了华盛顿州西部12所高中的高年级学生向成年期的过渡情况,以探究多重弱势、四种歧视类型以及保护资源对学生身心健康和学业成绩的影响。结果表明,多重弱势状况的增加和遭受歧视都与各项结果的下降有关;然而,当考虑保护资源时,影响会减弱。然而,随着弱势的增加,同伴和家庭资源的缓冲作用会受到抑制。在遭受的歧视和保护资源对结果的影响之间未发现交互作用。