• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济差异对 1 型糖尿病成人强化胰岛素治疗方案的影响:一项基于患者和医疗专业人员观点的定性研究。

Socioeconomic disparities in access to intensive insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study of patient and healthcare professional perspectives.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 11;18(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1061-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-019-1061-8
PMID:31604437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6788115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes is a complex chronic condition which requires lifelong treatment with insulin. Health outcomes are dependent on ability to self-manage the condition. Socioeconomic inequalities have been demonstrated in access to treatment and health outcomes for adults with type 1 diabetes; however, there is a paucity of research exploring how these disparities occur. This study explores the influence of socioeconomic factors in gaining access to intensive insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

We undertook a qualitative descriptive study informed by a phenomenological perspective. In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with 28 patients and 6 healthcare professionals involved in their care. The interviews were analysed using a thematic approach. The Candidacy theory for access to healthcare for vulnerable groups framed the analysis.

RESULTS

Access to intensive insulin regimens was through hospital-based specialist services in this sample. Patients from lower socioeconomic groups had difficulty accessing hospital-based services if they were in low paid work and because they lacked the ability to navigate the healthcare system. Once these patients were in the specialist system, access to intensive insulin regimens was limited by non-alignment with healthcare professional goals, poor health literacy, psychosocial problems and poor quality communication. These factors could also affect access to structured diabetes education which itself improved access to intensive insulin regimens. Contact with diabetes specialist nurses and attendance at structured diabetes education courses could ameliorate these barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to intensive insulin regimens was hindered for people in lower socioeconomic groups by a complex mix of factors relating to the permeability of specialist services, ability to navigate the healthcare system and patient interactions with healthcare providers. Improving access to diabetes specialist nurses and structured diabetes education for vulnerable patients could lessen socioeconomic disparities in both access to services and health outcomes.

摘要

背景

1 型糖尿病是一种复杂的慢性疾病,需要终身使用胰岛素进行治疗。健康结果取决于自我管理疾病的能力。在 1 型糖尿病成人的治疗和健康结果方面,已经证实存在社会经济不平等现象;然而,几乎没有研究探索这些差异是如何发生的。本研究探讨了社会经济因素对 1 型糖尿病成人获得强化胰岛素治疗方案的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项基于现象学观点的定性描述研究。对 28 名患者和 6 名参与其护理的医疗保健专业人员进行了深入的面对面访谈。使用主题分析方法对访谈进行了分析。弱势群体获得医疗保健的候选理论为分析提供了框架。

结果

在本样本中,强化胰岛素治疗方案是通过医院专科服务获得的。来自社会经济地位较低群体的患者如果从事低薪工作并且缺乏驾驭医疗系统的能力,他们很难获得医院服务。一旦这些患者进入专科系统,获得强化胰岛素治疗方案就会受到与医疗保健专业人员目标不一致、健康素养差、心理社会问题和沟通质量差等因素的限制。这些因素也可能会影响到结构化糖尿病教育的获得,而结构化糖尿病教育本身又会改善对强化胰岛素治疗方案的获得。与糖尿病专科护士的接触和参加结构化糖尿病教育课程可以减轻这些障碍。

结论

由于与专科服务的渗透性、驾驭医疗系统的能力以及患者与医疗保健提供者之间的互动有关的一系列复杂因素,社会经济地位较低群体获得强化胰岛素治疗方案的机会受到了阻碍。为弱势患者增加糖尿病专科护士和结构化糖尿病教育的机会可以减少服务和健康结果方面的社会经济差距。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic disparities in access to intensive insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study of patient and healthcare professional perspectives.社会经济差异对 1 型糖尿病成人强化胰岛素治疗方案的影响:一项基于患者和医疗专业人员观点的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 11;18(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1061-8.
2
A qualitative study on healthcare professionals' perceived barriers to insulin initiation in a multi-ethnic population.一项针对多民族人群中医疗保健专业人员认为的胰岛素起始障碍的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 4;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-28.
3
Barriers and facilitators to accessing insulin pump therapy by adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study.成人 1 型糖尿病患者获得胰岛素泵治疗的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Jan;58(1):93-105. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01595-5. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
4
A qualitative study of the experiences of insulin use by older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.一项关于老年 2 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素的体验的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 22;25(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02318-3.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
Exploring inequalities in access to and use of maternal health services in South Africa.探讨南非产妇健康服务获取和利用方面的不平等现象。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 21;12:120. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-120.
7
How social inequalities impact the course of treatment and care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a qualitative cross-sectional study from the patient's perspective.社会不平等如何影响2型糖尿病患者的治疗和护理过程:一项从患者角度进行的定性横断面研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 10;5(7):e008670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008670.
8
What do service providers in Southern Ethiopia say about barriers to using youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents?: Qualitative study.埃塞俄比亚南部的服务提供者如何看待青少年在使用青少年友好型性与生殖健康服务方面所面临的障碍?定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01092-0.
9
Supporting self-management after attending a structured education programme: a qualitative longitudinal investigation of type 1 diabetes patients' experiences and views.参加结构化教育项目后的自我管理支持:1 型糖尿病患者的经验和观点的定性纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 14;12:652. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-652.
10
Improving outcomes for multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Peruvian Amazon - a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals.提高秘鲁亚马逊地区耐多药结核病的治疗效果 - 一项定性研究,探讨了患者和医疗保健专业人员的经验和看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4429-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging inequity gaps in healthcare through tailored support: implementation perspectives of the Social Health Bridge-Building Programme.通过量身定制的支持缩小医疗保健中的不平等差距:社会健康桥梁建设计划的实施视角
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12359-8.
2
Patient, family and caregiver engagement in diabetes care: a scoping review protocol.患者、家属和照护者在糖尿病照护中的参与:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 28;14(8):e086772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086772.
3
Bridging Inequity Gaps in Healthcare Systems While Educating Future Healthcare Professionals-The Social Health Bridge-Building Programme.弥合医疗体系中的不平等差距,同时培养未来的医疗保健专业人员——社会健康桥梁建设计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 27;20(19):6837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20196837.
4
Bridging gaps in health? A qualitative study about bridge-building and social inequity in Danish healthcare.弥合健康差距?丹麦医疗保健中关于桥梁建设和社会不平等的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2241235. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2241235.
5
Mental Fatigue, Activities of Daily Living, Sick Leave and Functional Status among Patients with Long COVID: A Cross-Sectional Study.长新冠患者的精神疲劳、日常生活活动、病假和功能状态:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14739. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214739.
6
Barriers and Facilitators in Access to Diabetes, Hypertension, and Dyslipidemia Medicines: A Scoping Review.糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常药物获取的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2022 Sep 2;43:1604796. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604796. eCollection 2022.
7
Qualitative Research Methods in Chronic Disease: Introduction and Opportunities to Promote Health Equity.慢性病定性研究方法:介绍及促进健康公平的机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:37-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105104. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
8
Development of an Insulin Pen is a Patient-Centric Multidisciplinary Undertaking: A Commentary.胰岛素笔的研发是一项以患者为中心的多学科工作:述评。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):617-622. doi: 10.1177/19322968211058707. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
Barriers to Technology Use and Endocrinology Care for Underserved Communities With Type 1 Diabetes.服务不足的 1 型糖尿病社区在使用技术和接受内分泌学治疗方面的障碍。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1480-1490. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2753. Epub 2021 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research.在医疗保健研究中采用定性描述方法。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Nov 24;4:2333393617742282. doi: 10.1177/2333393617742282. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality, morbidity and diabetes management for adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.1型糖尿病成人患者在死亡率、发病率及糖尿病管理方面的社会经济不平等:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0177210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177210. eCollection 2017.
3
Who gains clinical benefit from using insulin pump therapy? A qualitative study of the perceptions and views of health professionals involved in the Relative Effectiveness of Pumps over MDI and Structured Education (REPOSE) trial.谁能从胰岛素泵治疗中获得临床益处?一项关于参与胰岛素泵与多次皮下注射及结构化教育相对有效性(REPOSE)试验的医疗专业人员的认知和观点的定性研究。
Diabet Med. 2016 Feb;33(2):243-51. doi: 10.1111/dme.12879. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
4
A qualitative study of patient choices in using emergency health care for long-term conditions: the importance of candidacy and recursivity.一项关于患者在使用急诊医疗服务治疗长期疾病时选择的定性研究:候选资格和递归性的重要性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
5
Race, socioeconomic status, and treatment center are associated with insulin pump therapy in youth in the first year following diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.种族、社会经济地位和治疗中心与 1 型糖尿病诊断后第一年青少年的胰岛素泵治疗相关。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Nov;15(11):929-34. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0132. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
6
Re-revisiting Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use: a systematic review of studies from 1998-2011.重新审视安徒生的卫生服务利用行为模型:对1998年至2011年研究的系统评价
Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:Doc11. doi: 10.3205/psm000089. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
7
Supporting self-management after attending a structured education programme: a qualitative longitudinal investigation of type 1 diabetes patients' experiences and views.参加结构化教育项目后的自我管理支持:1 型糖尿病患者的经验和观点的定性纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 14;12:652. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-652.
8
Working with young adults with Type 1 diabetes: views of a multidisciplinary care team and implications for service delivery.与 1 型糖尿病青年患者合作:多学科护理团队的观点及其对服务提供的影响。
Diabet Med. 2012 May;29(5):677-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03601.x.
9
Help Seeking and Access to Primary Care for People from "Hard-to-Reach" Groups with Common Mental Health Problems.患有常见心理健康问题的“难以接触到”群体寻求帮助及获得初级保健服务的情况。
Int J Family Med. 2011;2011:490634. doi: 10.1155/2011/490634. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
10
Differences in the quality of diabetes care caused by social inequalities disappear after treatment and education in a tertiary care centre.在三级保健中心进行治疗和教育后,由社会不平等导致的糖尿病护理质量差异消失了。
Diabet Med. 2012 May;29(5):640-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03455.x.