• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响景观偏好的因素的共识:基于跨文化比较的案例研究。

Consensus in factors affecting landscape preference: A case study based on a cross-cultural comparison.

机构信息

School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China; School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 15;252:109622. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109622. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109622
PMID:31605910
Abstract

Consensus in preference is a central issue in landscape perception research. Several studies have highlighted the relationships between landscape preference and demographic variables; however, consensus among different countries' observers remains poorly understood. This study was primarily conducted to examine the consensus in factors affecting landscape preferences between potential Chinese and English rural tourists. A questionnaire survey and experimental eye-tracking methods were used. The results showed that, regarding preference for their home countries' rural landscapes, the importance of vegetation is significantly greater for Chinese than for English tourists. Generally, the dominant factors affecting Chinese landscape preference involved progressive enhancement with tranquillity, diversity, traditional characteristics, and maintenance of buildings and human constructions, while English preferences focused on multifaceted maintenance and avoiding the intrusion of building and human constructions. Regarding preferences in favour of Chinese rural landscapes, higher consensus was likely to occur for the most and least preferred landscapes when landscape types were combined, which was even more obvious for the Chinese than the English individuals. When landscape types were separated, there were significant correlations between Chinese and English preferences for natural landscape types, while the considerable difference regarding manmade landscape types could be greater depending on the effects of different factors affecting the preferences for their home countries' landscapes. In addition, a significant effect of observers' attention pattern was presented, suggesting that landscapes providing an easy way to concentrate on smaller interest areas could significantly increase tranquillity and thus increase landscape preference. The present study provides evidence for previous judgement consensus studies and reference for the management or design of countryside landscapes with perceived restorative and visiting potential.

摘要

偏好共识是景观感知研究的核心问题。已有多项研究强调了景观偏好与人口统计学变量之间的关系,但不同国家观察者之间的共识仍了解甚少。本研究主要旨在探讨潜在的中国和英国农村游客对影响景观偏好的因素的共识。采用问卷调查和实验眼动追踪方法。结果表明,就对本国农村景观的偏好而言,植被对中国游客的重要性明显大于英国游客。一般而言,影响中国景观偏好的主导因素涉及随着宁静、多样性、传统特征以及建筑物和人工构筑物的维护而逐渐增强,而英国偏好则侧重于多方面的维护和避免建筑物和人工构筑物的侵入。就对中国农村景观的偏好而言,当将景观类型结合在一起时,最受欢迎和最不受欢迎的景观更有可能出现较高的共识,而对于中国人来说,这种情况比英国人更为明显。当将景观类型分开时,中国和英国对自然景观类型的偏好之间存在显著的相关性,而对于人造景观类型,则可能因不同因素对其本国景观偏好的影响而存在较大差异。此外,观察者注意力模式呈现出显著的影响,这表明提供一种易于集中关注较小兴趣区域的景观可以显著增加宁静感,从而提高景观偏好。本研究为之前的判断共识研究提供了证据,并为具有感知恢复力和访问潜力的乡村景观的管理或设计提供了参考。

相似文献

1
Consensus in factors affecting landscape preference: A case study based on a cross-cultural comparison.影响景观偏好的因素的共识:基于跨文化比较的案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 15;252:109622. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109622. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
2
Do Humans Really Prefer Semi-open Natural Landscapes? A Cross-Cultural Reappraisal.人类真的更喜欢半开放的自然景观吗?一项跨文化的重新评估。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 29;9:822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00822. eCollection 2018.
3
Consensus in landscape preference judgments: the effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics.景观偏好判断中的共识:景观视觉美学质量和受访者特征的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2014 May 1;137:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
The Influence of the Evolutionary Past on the Mind: An Analysis of the Preference for Landscapes in the Human Species.进化史对心智的影响:对人类物种中景观偏好的分析
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 7;9:2485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02485. eCollection 2018.
5
Similarities and Differences in the Outsiders and Insiders' Visual Preferences on Sacred Landscape.局外人与局内人对神圣景观视觉偏好的异同
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:743933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.743933. eCollection 2022.
6
Understanding different cultural ecosystem services: An exploration of rural landscape preferences based on geographic and social media data.理解不同的文化生态系统服务:基于地理和社交媒体数据的农村景观偏好探索。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 1;317:115487. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115487. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
7
Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes.景观评估与区分中的认知属性和审美偏好。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(9):2889-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.016. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
8
Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups.作为景观偏好预测指标的视觉尺度;组间比较
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(9):2882-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
9
Research on Rural Landscape Preference Based on TikTok Short Video Content and User Comments.基于 TikTok 短视频内容和用户评论的乡村景观偏好研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610115.
10
The index of the Prognosis Rural Landscape Preferences (IPRLP) as a tool of generalizing peoples' preferences on rural landscape.《农村景观偏好指标》(IPRLP)作为一种概括人们对农村景观偏好的工具。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109272. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109272. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional on-site perception study of stairway spaces in mountain city parks among young and older adult people: a case study of Pipa Mountain Park, Chongqing, China.山城公园楼梯空间中青年与老年人的多维现场感知研究:以中国重庆枇杷山公园为例
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1620884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1620884. eCollection 2025.
2
Natural or Human Landscape Beauty? Quantifying Aesthetic Experience at Longji Terraces Through Eye-Tracking.自然景观美还是人文景观美?通过眼动追踪量化龙脊梯田的审美体验。
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 May 7;18(3):15. doi: 10.3390/jemr18030015. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Modeling the Visual Landscape: A Review on Approaches, Methods and Techniques.
建模视觉景观:方法、技术与应用综述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;23(19):8135. doi: 10.3390/s23198135.
4
Urban cultural heritage is mentally restorative: an experimental study based on multiple psychophysiological measures.城市文化遗产具有心理恢复作用:一项基于多种心理生理测量方法的实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 17;14:1132052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132052. eCollection 2023.
5
The effects of audio-visual perceptual characteristics on environmental health of pedestrian streets with traffic noise: A case study in Dalian, China.视听感知特征对存在交通噪声的步行街环境健康的影响:以中国大连为例
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 31;14:1122639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122639. eCollection 2023.
6
Visual preference of plant features in different living environments using eye tracking and EEG.利用眼动追踪和 EEG 技术研究不同生活环境下对植物特征的视觉偏好。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279596. eCollection 2022.
7
Similarities and Differences in the Outsiders and Insiders' Visual Preferences on Sacred Landscape.局外人与局内人对神圣景观视觉偏好的异同
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:743933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.743933. eCollection 2022.
8
Study on selection of native greening plants based on eye-tracking technology.基于眼动追踪技术的乡土绿化植物选择研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):1092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05114-0.