• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过注意力选择提高消费品的偏好和价值。

Increased Preference and Value of Consumer Products by Attentional Selection.

作者信息

Makarina Nadiia, Hübner Ronald, Florack Arnd

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Graduate School of Decision Sciences, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 25;10:2086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02086. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02086
PMID:31607976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6773872/
Abstract

It is usually assumed that individuals base their preferences for products or other items on the utility or value associated with the items. However, there is evidence that the attentional selection of an item alone already modulates the preference for that item. This has been shown, for instance, in preference choice tasks with unknown consumer products. Products that served as targets in a preceding visual search task were preferred to former distractor products. However, it is unclear whether such effects can also be observed when individuals have pre-existing attitudes toward products and whether attentional selection can change the perceived value of products. Hence, the aim of the present research was to replicate the attentional-selection effect on choice with known products and examine whether selective attention affects the perceived value of products beyond choosing the items. In two experiments, we replicated the attentional-selection effect on item preference in a choice task. Items that had served as targets in the search task were preferred to previous distractors. Introducing a response deadline in the preference-choice task in Experiment 2 did not further increase this effect. However, the value of former targets was rated higher than that of former distractors. Hence, the present results indicate that attentional selection not only affects preference choices but can also increase the value of attended and selected items.

摘要

通常认为,个体对产品或其他物品的偏好基于与这些物品相关的效用或价值。然而,有证据表明,仅仅对某一物品的注意力选择就已经调节了对该物品的偏好。例如,在涉及未知消费产品的偏好选择任务中就已表明了这一点。在先前视觉搜索任务中作为目标的产品比之前的干扰产品更受青睐。然而,当个体对产品已有既定态度时,是否也能观察到这种效应,以及注意力选择是否会改变产品的感知价值,目前尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是在已知产品的情况下复制注意力选择对选择的影响,并检验选择性注意是否会在选择物品之外影响产品的感知价值。在两项实验中,我们在选择任务中复制了注意力选择对物品偏好的影响。在搜索任务中作为目标的物品比之前的干扰物更受青睐。在实验2的偏好选择任务中引入反应截止时间并没有进一步增强这种效应。然而,之前目标的价值被评定得高于之前干扰物的价值。因此,目前的结果表明,注意力选择不仅会影响偏好选择,还会提高被关注和选择物品的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941b/6773872/b709d8560864/fpsyg-10-02086-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941b/6773872/30aa8a53550a/fpsyg-10-02086-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941b/6773872/00f53649e21a/fpsyg-10-02086-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941b/6773872/b709d8560864/fpsyg-10-02086-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941b/6773872/30aa8a53550a/fpsyg-10-02086-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941b/6773872/00f53649e21a/fpsyg-10-02086-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941b/6773872/b709d8560864/fpsyg-10-02086-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Increased Preference and Value of Consumer Products by Attentional Selection.通过注意力选择提高消费品的偏好和价值。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 25;10:2086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02086. eCollection 2019.
2
The role of value in the attentional boost effect.价值在注意增强效应中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):523-542. doi: 10.1177/1747021818760791. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.统计规律独立于搜索策略调节注意捕获。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1763-1774. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1562-3.
4
Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.预测性干扰物情境有助于对高显著性目标进行注意选择,但对中等和低显著性目标则不然。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Mar;36(3):935-44. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22677. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
5
Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.按物体类别进行视觉搜索的快速引导
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):50-60. doi: 10.1037/a0033228. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
6
Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.知觉竞争促进行为选择和神经表征中奖励显著性的抑制。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 28;37(26):6242-6252. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0217-17.2017. Epub 2017 May 24.
7
Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.选择历史会持续改变注意力过滤设置,且不受自上而下控制的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2017 May;54(5):736-754. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12830. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
8
Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task.“是”刺激的估值还是“否”刺激的贬值?关于在“是/否”任务后对被关注的“是”刺激偏好增加的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 30;8:474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00474. eCollection 2017.
9
Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.视觉搜索过程中低显著度分心物干扰的电生理学证据。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jul;55(7):e13068. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13068. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.量化工作记忆匹配目标与干扰项的注意力影响。
Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):452-466. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Option similarity modulates the link between choice and memory.选择相似性调节了选择和记忆之间的联系。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):7-22. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01439-x. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Investigating the mechanisms by which selective attention affects subsequent preferences and choice.研究选择性注意影响后续偏好和选择的机制。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 11;12(1):19345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23859-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Too Tasty to Be Ignored.美味不可忽视。
Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;64(5):338-345. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000373.
2
Judgments at Gaze Value: Gaze Cuing in Banner Advertisements, Its Effect on Attention Allocation and Product Judgments.注视价值判断:横幅广告中的注视提示及其对注意力分配和产品判断的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 2;8:881. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00881. eCollection 2017.
3
Endogenous formation of preferences: Choices systematically change willingness-to-pay for goods.偏好的内生形成:选择会系统性地改变对商品的支付意愿。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1872-1882. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000415. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Action and valence modulate choice and choice-induced preference change.行动与效价调节选择以及选择诱发的偏好变化。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):e0119682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119682. eCollection 2015.
5
Forced to remember: when memory is biased by salient information.被迫记忆:当记忆受到显著信息的影响时。
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Apr 15;283:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
Cognitive dissonance resolution is related to episodic memory.认知失调的解决与情景记忆有关。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108579. eCollection 2014.
7
Choice both affects and reflects preferences.选择既影响偏好,又反映偏好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1415-27. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.863953. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
8
Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory.在一项侧抑制任务中,分心物的贬抑:没有分心物识别记忆的对象特异性效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):613-25. doi: 10.1037/a0034130. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
9
Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying value-based decision-making: from core values to economic value.价值决策的神经认知机制:从核心价值观到经济价值。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 24;7:398. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00398. eCollection 2013.
10
Choice-induced preference change in the free-choice paradigm: a critical methodological review.自由选择范式中的选择诱导偏好变化:批判性方法学评论。
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 7;4:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00041. eCollection 2013.