Suppr超能文献

量化工作记忆匹配目标与干扰项的注意力影响。

Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

作者信息

Carlisle Nancy B, Woodman Geoffrey F

机构信息

Lehigh University, Department of Psychology, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

Vanderbilt University Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):452-466. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

Abstract

Various theoretical proposals have been put forward to explain how memory representations control attention during visual search. In this study, we use the first saccade on each trial as away to quantify the attentional impact of multiple types of representations held in working memory. Across two experiments, we found that a search target maintained in working memory was attended over 20 times more frequently than a non-memory-matching distractor. In addition, an item matching an additional object represented in working memory was attended 2 times more frequently than a non-memory matching distractor. These findings show that there is a measurable attentional impact of items maintained in working memory for a future task, however, such representations have a much weaker attentional impact than working memory representations of search targets.

摘要

为了解释记忆表征如何在视觉搜索过程中控制注意力,人们提出了各种理论建议。在本研究中,我们将每次试验中的首次眼跳作为一种方式,来量化工作记忆中多种类型表征的注意力影响。在两项实验中,我们发现,工作记忆中保持的搜索目标被关注的频率比非记忆匹配干扰项高出20倍以上。此外,与工作记忆中额外表征的物体相匹配的项目被关注的频率比非记忆匹配干扰项高出2倍。这些发现表明,对于未来任务而言,工作记忆中保持的项目存在可测量的注意力影响,然而,此类表征的注意力影响比搜索目标的工作记忆表征要弱得多。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.
Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):452-466. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Aug;26(4):1340-1346. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01608-7.
3
Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
Cortex. 2020 Jan;122:159-169. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):760-770. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02477-4. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
5
Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jun;21(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21083.
6
Long-term memory for distractors: Effects of involuntary attention from working memory.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):401-416. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01469-5. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
7
Visual working memory representations bias attention more when they are the target of an action plan.
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105274. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105274. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
9
Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 11;15:620413. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.620413. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

2
Top-down suppression of negative features applies flexibly contingent on visual search goals.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1120-1147. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02882-x. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Semantically congruent bimodal presentation modulates cognitive control over attentional guidance by working memory.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jul;52(5):1065-1078. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01521-y. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
4
Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1093-1111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
Theoretical distinction between functional states in working memory and their corresponding neural states.
Vis cogn. 2020 Sep 24;28(5-8):420-432. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1825141.
6
What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 16;140:107376. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107376. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.
Yale J Biol Med. 2019 Mar 25;92(1):103-113. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation.
Cognition. 2019 May;186:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements.
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 17;8(1):13876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32144-4.
4
The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jul;44(7):992-1011. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000509. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
5
Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 21;7(1):6107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05865-1.
7
Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1252-1260. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1204-5.
8
Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jul;42(7):911-7. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000230. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
The Effects of Feature-Based Priming and Visual Working Memory on Oculomotor Capture.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 13;10(11):e0142696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142696. eCollection 2015.
10
Task-irrelevant memories rapidly gain attentional control with learning.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):354-362. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000134. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验