• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合知识鸿沟:通过 A/B 测试检验理想的术后自体乳房重建教育材料。

Bridging the Knowledge Gap: An Examination of the Ideal Postoperative Autologous Breast Reconstruction Educational Material with A/B Testing.

机构信息

From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):258-266. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006373.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006373
PMID:31609288
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor health literacy is an epidemic in the United States, associated with higher mortality rates and poor postoperative care. Autologous breast reconstruction is highly complex, and the identification of complications is difficult even for non-plastic surgeon practitioners. The authors sought to explore the problem of health literacy in this context and identify the ideal postoperative patient education materials.

METHODS

Available online postoperative patient education materials for autologous breast reconstruction and corresponding readability scores were assessed. To derive the ideal formula for materials, the authors crowd-sourced quizzes with A/B testing, a method to examine the outcome of two versions of a single variable. The authors implemented their findings and compared performance on postoperative quizzes with and without oral reinforcement.

RESULTS

Of the 12 postoperative flap complication patient education materials found through an Internet search, the average grade level readability level was 9.9. Only one of 12 (8.3 percent) mentioned symptoms and signs of flap compromise. The A/B tests result revealed that text approximately 400 to 800 words written on a sixth-grade level led to the highest quiz scores. Patients scored significantly higher on the postoperative day-2 quiz when patient education materials, modeled after these findings, were reinforced with oral presentation (p = 0.0059). Retention of high quiz scores remained at postoperative day 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available patient education materials are at a high reading level and lack specific information on the identification of flap compromise. The authors propose the most effective postoperative instructions to be approximately 400 to 800 words written on a grade-six level with images and oral reinforcement.

摘要

背景

在美国,健康素养较差是一种普遍存在的现象,与较高的死亡率和较差的术后护理有关。自体乳房重建非常复杂,即使是非整形外科医生也很难识别并发症。作者试图在这种情况下探讨健康素养问题,并确定理想的术后患者教育材料。

方法

评估了可在线获取的自体乳房重建术后患者教育材料及其相应的可读性评分。为了得出材料的理想公式,作者通过众包测验和 A/B 测试进行了研究,A/B 测试是一种检验单一变量两种版本结果的方法。作者实施了他们的发现,并比较了有无口头强化的术后测验表现。

结果

通过互联网搜索共找到了 12 份关于皮瓣并发症的术后患者教育材料,平均阅读水平为 9.9 年级。只有 12 份材料中的 1 份(8.3%)提到了皮瓣受损的症状和体征。A/B 测试的结果表明,以六年级水平撰写的大约 400 到 800 字的文本可以获得最高的测验分数。当患者教育材料以这些发现为模型并辅以口头陈述时,患者在术后第 2 天的测验中得分显著更高(p=0.0059)。在术后第 10 天,高测验分数的保持率仍然很高。

结论

目前可用的患者教育材料阅读水平较高,并且缺乏关于识别皮瓣受损的具体信息。作者提出,最有效的术后指导应该是大约 400 到 800 字的文本,配以图像和口头强化,阅读水平为六年级。

相似文献

1
Bridging the Knowledge Gap: An Examination of the Ideal Postoperative Autologous Breast Reconstruction Educational Material with A/B Testing.弥合知识鸿沟:通过 A/B 测试检验理想的术后自体乳房重建教育材料。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):258-266. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006373.
2
Evolution in Monitoring of Free Flap Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Is There a Best Way?游离皮瓣自体乳房重建术后乳头保留乳房切除术的监测演变:是否有最佳方法?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1086-1093. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004271.
3
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.
4
Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?新的联邦乳房密度立法的效果会否因目前可获得的在线患者教育材料而减弱?
Acad Radiol. 2020 Oct;27(10):1400-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
5
Prospective Evaluation of Obese Patients Undergoing Autologous Abdominal Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.前瞻性评估肥胖患者行自体腹部游离皮瓣乳房再造术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Aug;142(2):120e-125e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004550.
6
Assessment of online patient materials for breast reconstruction.乳房重建在线患者资料评估
J Surg Res. 2015 Nov;199(1):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.072. Epub 2015 May 15.
7
Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.眼科患者教育材料的可读性:一项单机构研究及系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0.
8
Effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer based on type of free flap reconstruction.基于游离皮瓣重建类型的乳腺癌放射治疗效果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan;131(1):1e-8e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729d33.
9
Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.美国运动医学学会网站上患者教育材料的可读性。
Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Nov;42(4):125-30. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2099.
10
Comparative analysis of online patient education material pertaining to hepatitis and its complications.关于肝炎及其并发症的在线患者教育材料的比较分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;28(5):558-66. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000588.

引用本文的文献

1
Descriptive Analysis of Preoperative Breast Reconstruction Patient Expectations Using the BREAST-Q Expectations Module.使用BREAST-Q期望模块对术前乳房重建患者期望进行描述性分析。
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Feb;33(1):16-22. doi: 10.1177/22925503231184261. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Health Literacy in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Literature Review.眼面部整形手术中的健康素养:文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 7;15(7):e41518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41518. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
An Overview of Innovative Approaches to Support Timely and Agile Health Communication Research and Practice.
创新方法概述,支持及时和灵活的健康传播研究和实践。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15073. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215073.
4
Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.整形外科学中的健康素养:一项范围综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e4247. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004247. eCollection 2022 Apr.