From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):258-266. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006373.
Poor health literacy is an epidemic in the United States, associated with higher mortality rates and poor postoperative care. Autologous breast reconstruction is highly complex, and the identification of complications is difficult even for non-plastic surgeon practitioners. The authors sought to explore the problem of health literacy in this context and identify the ideal postoperative patient education materials.
Available online postoperative patient education materials for autologous breast reconstruction and corresponding readability scores were assessed. To derive the ideal formula for materials, the authors crowd-sourced quizzes with A/B testing, a method to examine the outcome of two versions of a single variable. The authors implemented their findings and compared performance on postoperative quizzes with and without oral reinforcement.
Of the 12 postoperative flap complication patient education materials found through an Internet search, the average grade level readability level was 9.9. Only one of 12 (8.3 percent) mentioned symptoms and signs of flap compromise. The A/B tests result revealed that text approximately 400 to 800 words written on a sixth-grade level led to the highest quiz scores. Patients scored significantly higher on the postoperative day-2 quiz when patient education materials, modeled after these findings, were reinforced with oral presentation (p = 0.0059). Retention of high quiz scores remained at postoperative day 10.
Currently available patient education materials are at a high reading level and lack specific information on the identification of flap compromise. The authors propose the most effective postoperative instructions to be approximately 400 to 800 words written on a grade-six level with images and oral reinforcement.
在美国,健康素养较差是一种普遍存在的现象,与较高的死亡率和较差的术后护理有关。自体乳房重建非常复杂,即使是非整形外科医生也很难识别并发症。作者试图在这种情况下探讨健康素养问题,并确定理想的术后患者教育材料。
评估了可在线获取的自体乳房重建术后患者教育材料及其相应的可读性评分。为了得出材料的理想公式,作者通过众包测验和 A/B 测试进行了研究,A/B 测试是一种检验单一变量两种版本结果的方法。作者实施了他们的发现,并比较了有无口头强化的术后测验表现。
通过互联网搜索共找到了 12 份关于皮瓣并发症的术后患者教育材料,平均阅读水平为 9.9 年级。只有 12 份材料中的 1 份(8.3%)提到了皮瓣受损的症状和体征。A/B 测试的结果表明,以六年级水平撰写的大约 400 到 800 字的文本可以获得最高的测验分数。当患者教育材料以这些发现为模型并辅以口头陈述时,患者在术后第 2 天的测验中得分显著更高(p=0.0059)。在术后第 10 天,高测验分数的保持率仍然很高。
目前可用的患者教育材料阅读水平较高,并且缺乏关于识别皮瓣受损的具体信息。作者提出,最有效的术后指导应该是大约 400 到 800 字的文本,配以图像和口头强化,阅读水平为六年级。