Suppr超能文献

眼面部整形手术中的健康素养:文献综述

Health Literacy in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Literature Review.

作者信息

Murdock Narmien, Missner Alexander, Mehta Viraj

机构信息

Ophthalmology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Ophthalmology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 7;15(7):e41518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41518. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Patient satisfaction following oculofacial cosmetic procedures depends on preoperative expectations, which may be influenced by online material. Patients with poor health literacy are particularly vulnerable to misinformation and low-quality resources. However, few studies have evaluated the quality of online information on common oculofacial plastic surgeries and procedures. This study aimed to review the literature on the readability and quality of online material related to oculofacial plastic surgery. We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database and included 10 studies in our review. Among the readability scores reported in these studies, the lowest was 10, representing a tenth-grade reading level. Furthermore, the online materials were often rated as "poor" quality based on multiple grading scales. Our systematic review of the literature demonstrates that online materials covering common oculofacial plastic surgery procedures are consistently of poor quality and exceed the recommended readability level. Therefore, considering these online materials that influence patient expectations could enable oculofacial plastic surgeons to better tailor their preoperative counseling.

摘要

眼面部整形手术后的患者满意度取决于术前预期,而术前预期可能会受到网络资料的影响。健康素养较差的患者尤其容易受到错误信息和低质量资源的影响。然而,很少有研究评估常见眼面部整形手术和操作的网络信息质量。本研究旨在回顾关于眼面部整形手术相关网络资料的可读性和质量的文献。我们对PubMed/MEDLINE数据库进行了系统检索,纳入了10项研究进行综述。在这些研究报告的可读性得分中,最低分为10分,相当于十年级的阅读水平。此外,根据多个评分量表,网络资料的质量通常被评为“差”。我们对文献的系统综述表明,涵盖常见眼面部整形手术操作的网络资料质量一直很差,且超出了推荐的可读性水平。因此,考虑这些影响患者预期的网络资料可以使眼面部整形外科医生更好地调整他们的术前咨询。

相似文献

1
Health Literacy in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Literature Review.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 7;15(7):e41518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41518. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Oculofacial plastic surgery-related online search trends including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Orbit. 2021 Feb;40(1):44-50. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1852264. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
4
Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):547-551. doi: 10.1177/1558944717725384. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
5
Facial Plastic Surgery Patient Resources Exceed National Institute Recommendations.
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 May;28(3):759-763. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003435.
6
Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e4247. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004247. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
The Overweight and Obese Patient in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;39(6):525-532. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002389. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
8
Readability of Online Materials for Rhinoplasty.
World J Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;7(1):89-96.
9
Isolated Orbital Floor Fracture Management: A Survey and Comparison of American Oculofacial and Facial Plastic Surgeon Preferences.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2019 Jun;12(2):112-121. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639350. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
10
Personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic for oculofacial plastic and orbital surgery.
Orbit. 2021 Aug;40(4):281-286. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1781200. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e4247. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004247. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Dissemination of validated health literacy videos: A tailored approach.
Cancer Med. 2022 Apr;11(7):1678-1687. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4572. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):754-759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02504-z. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok.
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):2078-2083. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291.
5
Readability Analysis of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Patient Educational Brochures.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):77-82. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1919721. Epub 2021 May 11.
6
Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Jul/Aug;22(4):255-261. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2019.0013. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
7
Evaluating the use of educational videos to support the tuberculosis care cascade in remote Madagascar.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 Jan 1;24(1):28-35. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.19.0161.
8
Can You Trust What You Watch? An Assessment of the Quality of Information in Aesthetic Surgery Videos on YouTube.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):329e-336e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006463.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验