Albright James T, Duncan Newton O, Smerica Abel M, Edmonds Joseph L
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan;128:109703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109703. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
Pediatric tonsillectomy is a frequently performed procedure using a variety of surgical techniques. Despite decades of modern surgical experience and advances in tools and techniques, a consensus on which technique is superior for minimizing complications has not been established. In a 2014 study, the authors examined differing surgical techniques and devices to determine if there was a significant difference in the bleed rates based on technique and device [1]. In that study 7024 children were evaluated, of which a total of 1.4% (n = 99) of children experienced a postoperative hemorrhage that required a second surgery. There was no significant difference found between the four different techniques that were evaluated. Although the combined rates of post-operative hemorrhage requiring a second surgery was lower compared to many other published reports, we hypothesized that continued improvement in surgical techniques could eliminate post-operative hemorrhage completely. As follow up to that study, we decided on a collective change in technique, and subsequent analysis of our post-operative results with respect to only one outcome, post-operative hemorrhage requiring a second surgery. With a new standardized technique in place, we retrospectively evaluated one year of surgical outcomes. These procedures were performed using the technique of a modified and complete, intra-capsular Coblator tonsillectomy. Of the 783 tonsillectomies done in 12 months, we found there were 0 patients that had experienced a postoperative hemorrhage requiring a second surgery. Based on our previous study with a rate of 1.4% post-operative hemorrhage we would have expected to have 11 episodes of post-operative hemorrhage requiring a second surgery.
小儿扁桃体切除术是一种经常采用多种外科技术实施的手术。尽管有几十年的现代外科手术经验以及工具和技术的进步,但对于哪种技术在使并发症最小化方面更具优势尚未达成共识。在一项2014年的研究中,作者检查了不同的手术技术和设备,以确定基于技术和设备的出血率是否存在显著差异[1]。在该研究中,对7024名儿童进行了评估,其中共有1.4%(n = 99)的儿童经历了需要二次手术的术后出血。在所评估的四种不同技术之间未发现显著差异。尽管需要二次手术的术后出血综合发生率低于许多其他已发表的报告,但我们推测手术技术的持续改进可以完全消除术后出血。作为该研究的后续,我们决定在技术上进行集体改变,并随后仅针对一个结果,即需要二次手术的术后出血,对我们的术后结果进行分析。采用一种新的标准化技术后,我们回顾性评估了一年的手术结果。这些手术采用改良的完全囊内低温等离子扁桃体切除术技术进行。在12个月内进行的783例扁桃体切除术中,我们发现没有患者经历需要二次手术的术后出血。基于我们之前术后出血率为1.4%的研究,我们原本预计会有11例需要二次手术的术后出血事件。