• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经单中心回顾性比较,发现 BiZact 与 Coblator 两种技术用于扁桃体切除术后出血的效果相当。

A single center retrospective comparison of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage between BiZact and Coblator.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;158:111165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111165. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111165
PMID:35500397
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over 550,000 tonsillectomies are performed every year. While post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH) has been studied in the coblator, bovie, and cold steel technique, there is a dearth of studies examining the post-tonsillectomy outcome using BiZact. This study examines the rate of BiZact PTH requiring control of hemorrhage in the OR and assess resident comfort using the device.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review for all tonsillectomies performed between January 2018 and December 2020 were performed. Rates of PTH were analyzed. In addition, a 7-question BiZact resident experience survey was administered to 25 otolaryngology residents.

RESULTS

1384 patients were included in this study; 444 (32%) Bizact and 940 (68%) Coblation. 11 (2.48%) BiZact patients had PTH requiring OR for control of hemorrhage, compared to 44 (4.68%) Coblation patients. There were no patient deaths because of PTH. The mean age of patients with PTH was 7.44 (SD 4.07) years old. 22 (88%) residents responded to the survey. 17 (77.27%) felt more confident with Coblator while performing tonsillectomy most commonly reported for ease of use, followed by BiZact 4 (18.18%), most commonly reported for improved surgical plane.

CONCLUSION

BiZact is a safe and effective addition. At our institution, the rate of secondary PTH requiring OR intervention for BiZact is comparable to the national average for other tonsillectomy devices. The rate of BiZact PTH requiring OR intervention in our experience was nearly half of those done with Coblator. Overall residents at SCHC preferred Coblator over BiZact mainly attributed to Coblator's versatility and ability to control intraoperative tonsil bleeding without additional instruments despite BiZact's shorter operative time.

摘要

简介

每年进行超过 55 万例扁桃体切除术。虽然已经在 COBLATOR、BOVIE 和冷钢技术中研究了扁桃体切除术后出血(PTH),但缺乏使用 BiZact 检查扁桃体切除术后结果的研究。本研究检查了使用 BiZact 控制 OR 中出血的 PTH 发生率,并评估了该设备对住院医师的舒适度。

方法

对 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间进行的所有扁桃体切除术进行回顾性图表审查。分析了 PTH 的发生率。此外,对 25 名耳鼻喉科住院医师进行了 7 个问题的 BiZact 住院医师体验调查。

结果

本研究纳入 1384 例患者;444 例(32%)为 BiZact,940 例(68%)为 Coblation。11 例(2.48%)BiZact 患者发生 PTH,需要 OR 控制出血,而 Coblation 患者为 44 例(4.68%)。没有因 PTH 导致患者死亡。发生 PTH 的患者平均年龄为 7.44 岁(标准差 4.07)。22 名(88%)住院医师对调查做出了回应。17 名(77.27%)在进行扁桃体切除术时对 COBLATOR 更有信心,最常报告的是使用方便,其次是 BiZact 4 名(18.18%),最常报告的是改善手术平面。

结论

BiZact 是一种安全有效的补充。在我们的机构中,BiZact 需要 OR 干预的继发性 PTH 发生率与其他扁桃体切除术设备的全国平均水平相当。在我们的经验中,BiZact 需要 OR 干预的 PTH 发生率几乎是 Coblator 的一半。总体而言,SCHC 的住院医师更喜欢 Coblator 而不是 BiZact,主要归因于 Coblator 的多功能性和在不使用额外器械的情况下控制术中扁桃体出血的能力,尽管 BiZact 的手术时间更短。

相似文献

1
A single center retrospective comparison of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage between BiZact and Coblator.经单中心回顾性比较,发现 BiZact 与 Coblator 两种技术用于扁桃体切除术后出血的效果相当。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;158:111165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111165. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Coblation versus BiZact extra-capsular tonsillectomy in adults: a randomized control trial.低温射频消融术与 BiZact 法在成年人扁桃体切除术的对比:一项随机对照试验。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 May;94(5):861-866. doi: 10.1111/ans.19007. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage: assessment of risk factors with special attention to introduction of coblation technique.扁桃体切除术后出血:危险因素评估,特别关注低温等离子射频消融技术的引入
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;266(7):1011-5. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0834-2. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
4
Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage in children: a single surgeon's experience with coblation compared to diathermy.儿童扁桃体切除术后出血:单外科医生比较等离子与电凝的经验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;270(1):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2098-0. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
5
Effect of the BiZact™ Low-Temperature Dissecting Device on Intra- and Postoperative Morbidities Related to Tonsillectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BiZact™ 低温解剖装置对扁桃体切除术相关术中及术后并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 29;60(9):1415. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091415.
6
Bipolar diathermy-assisted coblation really affects post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate and white membrane in paediatric tonsillectomy.双极透热辅助等离子消融术确实会影响小儿扁桃体切除术后的出血率及白膜情况。
B-ENT. 2017;13(1 Suppl 27):45-49.
7
Application of Coblation Tonsillectomy with Inferior Pole Capsule Preservation in Pediatric Patients.低温等离子扁桃体切除术联合下极被膜保留技术在小儿患者中的应用。
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):1157-1162. doi: 10.1002/lary.29089. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.
9
Postoperative hemorrhage following coblation tonsillectomy with and without suture: A randomized study in Chinese adults.中文成年人应用及不应用缝线行等离子扁桃体切除术术后出血的随机研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102760. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102760. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
10
Very-Low Energy Monopolar Reduces Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage Versus Standard Energy Techniques.极低能量单极技术相较于标准能量技术可减少扁桃体切除术后出血。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Nov;131(11):2505-2511. doi: 10.1002/lary.29587. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the BiZact™ Low-Temperature Dissecting Device on Intra- and Postoperative Morbidities Related to Tonsillectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BiZact™ 低温解剖装置对扁桃体切除术相关术中及术后并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 29;60(9):1415. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091415.