McCaughan Dorothy, Booth Alison, Jackson Cath, Lalor Simon, Ramdharry Gita, O'Connor Rory J, Phillips Margaret, Bowers Roy, McDaid Catriona
York Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 17;9(10):e029313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029313.
Adults with knee instability related to neuromuscular disorders or central nervous conditions often experience mobility problems and rely on orthoses to improve function and mobility. Patient views of device effectiveness and acceptability are underexplored. Our study aimed to elicit device users' perspectives regarding fitting, acceptability, effectiveness and use of orthoses, and identify important treatment outcomes.
Qualitative descriptive study using in-depth semistructured interviews. Interview transcriptions were coded and thematically analysed, using 'Framework'.
A purposive sample of 24 adult users of orthotic devices. Nineteen patients were recruited across three National Health Service sites, and five people through charities/patient support groups in England. Half of the participants had been diagnosed with poliomyelitis, and the remainder with multiple sclerosis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, spinal injury or spina bifida, and stroke. The median age of participants was 64.5 years (range 36-80 years).
Patients' medical condition impacted significantly on daily life. Participants relied on orthotic devices to enable engagement in daily activities. Patient goals for mobility were linked to individual circumstances. Desired treatment outcomes included reduction in pain, trips and falls, with improved balance and stability. Effectiveness, reliability, comfort and durability were the most valued features of orthoses and associated with reported use. Obtaining suitable footwear alongside orthotic devices was a significant concern. Time pressures during device fitting were viewed negatively.
Orthotic devices for knee instability play a crucial role in promoting, maintaining and enhancing physical and psychological health and well-being, enabling patients to work, engage in family life and enjoy social activities. Future research should consider how best to measure the impact of orthotic devices on patient quality of life and daily functioning outside the clinic setting, as well as device use and any adverse effects.
This qualitative study was retrospectively registered as Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN65240228.
与神经肌肉疾病或中枢神经疾病相关的膝关节不稳定的成年人常面临行动问题,并依靠矫形器来改善功能和行动能力。患者对器械有效性和可接受性的看法尚未得到充分研究。我们的研究旨在了解器械使用者对矫形器的适配、可接受性、有效性及使用的看法,并确定重要的治疗结果。
采用深入的半结构化访谈进行定性描述性研究。访谈记录进行编码并使用“框架”进行主题分析。
24名成年矫形器械使用者的目的抽样。19名患者通过三个国民保健服务机构招募,5人通过英国的慈善机构/患者支持团体招募。一半参与者被诊断为患有小儿麻痹症,其余患有多发性硬化症、夏科-马里-图思病、脊髓损伤或脊柱裂以及中风。参与者的年龄中位数为64.5岁(范围36 - 80岁)。
患者的病情对日常生活有显著影响。参与者依靠矫形器械来参与日常活动。患者的行动目标与个人情况相关。期望的治疗结果包括减轻疼痛、减少绊倒和跌倒次数,并改善平衡和稳定性。有效性、可靠性、舒适性和耐用性是矫形器最受重视的特征,并与报告的使用情况相关。在使用矫形器械的同时获得合适的鞋类是一个重大问题。器械适配过程中的时间压力被视为负面因素。
用于膝关节不稳定的矫形器械在促进、维持和增强身心健康及幸福感方面发挥着关键作用,使患者能够工作、参与家庭生活并享受社交活动。未来的研究应考虑如何最好地衡量矫形器械对患者生活质量和诊所外日常功能的影响,以及器械的使用情况和任何不良影响。
这项定性研究已追溯注册为当前受控试验ISRCTN65240228。