McMinn Brian R, Klemm Sara, Korajkic Asja, Wyatt Kimberly M, Herrmann Michael P, Haugland Richard A, Lu Jingrang, Villegas Eric N, Frye Craig
National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development United States Environmental Protection Laboratory 26 West Martin Luther King Drive Cincinnati, OH 45268 United States.
Thomas More College 33 Thomas More Parkway Crestview Hills, Kentucky 41017.
Ecol Eng. 2019;128:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.11.026.
A constructed, variable-flow treatment wetland was evaluated for its ability to reduce microbial loads from the Banklick Creek, an impacted recreational waterway in Northern Kentucky. For this study, levels of traditional ( and enterococci measured by culture and molecular techniques) and alternative fecal indicators (infectious somatic and F+ coliphage, spp. and by culture), potential pathogens (molecular signal of spp.) as well as various microbial source tracking (MST) markers (human fecal marker HF183 and avian fecal marker GFD) were monitored during the summer and early fall through five treatment stages within the Banklick Creek Wetland. No difference in concentrations of traditional or alternative fecal indicators were observed in any of the sites monitored. Microbial source tracking markers were employed to identify sources of fecal contamination within the wetland. Human marker HF183 concentrations at beginning stages of treatment were found to be significantly higher ( value range: 0.0016-0.0003) than levels at later stages. Conversely, at later stages of treatment where frequent bird activity was observed, and avian marker (GFD) signals were detected at significantly higher frequencies ( value range: 0.024 to <0.0001), and both signals were strongly correlated ( = 0.0001). Our study suggests constructed wetlands are an effective means for removal of microbial contamination in ambient waters, but reliance on general fecal indicators is not ideal for determining system efficacy or assessing appropriate remediation efforts.
对一个人工建造的可变流量处理湿地进行了评估,以确定其减少来自班克利克溪微生物负荷的能力,班克利克溪是肯塔基州北部一条受影响的休闲水道。在本研究中,在夏季和初秋期间,通过班克利克溪湿地的五个处理阶段,监测了传统(通过培养和分子技术测量的粪大肠菌群和肠球菌)和替代粪便指示物(传染性体细胞和F+噬菌体、通过培养的 spp.和 )、潜在病原体( spp.的分子信号)以及各种微生物源追踪(MST)标记物(人类粪便标记物HF183和禽类粪便标记物GFD)的水平。在监测的任何地点,传统或替代粪便指示物的浓度均未观察到差异。采用微生物源追踪标记物来识别湿地内粪便污染的来源。发现处理初期的人类标记物HF183浓度显著高于后期(数值范围:0.0016 - 0.0003)。相反,在观察到频繁鸟类活动的处理后期,检测到 和禽类标记物(GFD)信号的频率显著更高(数值范围:0.024至<0.0001),并且这两种信号高度相关( = 0.0001)。我们的研究表明,人工湿地是去除环境水体中微生物污染的有效手段,但依靠一般粪便指示物来确定系统功效或评估适当的修复措施并不理想。