McDonald Julia B, Bozzay Melanie L, Bresin Konrad, Verona Edelyn
University of South Florida, United States of America.
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, United States of America.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 May;163:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
A prominent characteristic of externalizing psychopathology is the inability to suppress or modulate behavioral responses and impulses. These tendencies have been associated with cognitive indicators of inhibitory control (P3) and error processing (error-related negativity [ERN] and positivity [Pe]). However, the extent to which these trait-like components are characteristic of specific manifestations, or externalizing proneness more generally, remains unclear. Our study aimed to further contextualize externalizing behaviors by examining associations between distinct facets of externalizing symptoms and relevant behavioral phenotypes (substance use, aggression, pathological personality and internalizing symptoms) as well as electrophysiological and behavioral indices of inhibitory control (congruence and no-go P3, flanker interference, commission errors) and error processing (ERN and Pe, post-error slowing). Using a sample of community and jail dwelling offenders (N = 497), we used Confirmatory Factor Analyses to estimate a general externalizing factor (EXT), representing shared variance, and latent factors representing symptoms related to callous-aggression (CAL; conduct disorder and antisocial personality disorder) and alcohol and drug dependence (AD and DD). Additionally, a subset of participants (N = 89) had their brain activity recorded during a flanker task. Factor analyses supported general EXT and CAL factors; however, unique AD/DD overlapped highly with shared EXT, suggesting that DSM substance use symptoms in our study reflect more general problems with disconstraint/impulsivity rather than variance specific to substances. The general EXT was marked by behavioral correlates of impulsivity and negative affect, and laboratory task deficits in error monitoring, but with greater differential processing of inhibitory cues. The CAL specific factor was associated with affective shallowness phenotype, and, interestingly, laboratory measures of enhanced processing of inhibitory cues and error adjustment. This research has implications for understanding neurocognitive processes associated with distinct manifestations of disordered behavioral inhibition.
外化性精神病理学的一个突出特征是无法抑制或调节行为反应及冲动。这些倾向与抑制控制(P3)和错误处理(错误相关负波[ERN]和正波[Pe])的认知指标有关。然而,这些特质样成分在多大程度上是特定表现形式的特征,或者更普遍地说是外化倾向的特征,仍不清楚。我们的研究旨在通过检查外化症状的不同方面与相关行为表型(物质使用、攻击行为、病态人格和内化症状)之间的关联,以及抑制控制(一致性和停止信号P3、侧翼干扰、执行错误)和错误处理(ERN和Pe、错误后减缓)的电生理和行为指标,进一步将外化行为置于具体情境中。我们以社区和监狱中的罪犯为样本(N = 497),使用验证性因素分析来估计一个代表共同方差的一般外化因素(EXT),以及代表与冷酷无情-攻击行为(CAL;品行障碍和反社会人格障碍)以及酒精和药物依赖(AD和DD)相关症状的潜在因素。此外,一部分参与者(N = 89)在侧翼任务期间记录了他们的大脑活动。因素分析支持一般EXT和CAL因素;然而,独特的AD/DD与共同的EXT高度重叠,这表明我们研究中的DSM物质使用症状反映的是更普遍的自我约束/冲动问题,而非特定于物质的方差。一般EXT的特征是冲动和消极情绪的行为相关性,以及错误监测方面的实验室任务缺陷,但对抑制性线索有更大的差异处理。CAL特定因素与情感浅薄表型相关,有趣的是,还与抑制性线索处理增强和错误调整的实验室测量相关。这项研究对于理解与行为抑制障碍的不同表现相关的神经认知过程具有启示意义。