Patel Vijay A, Dunklebarger Mitchell, Banerjee Kalins, Shokri Tom, Zhan Xiang, Isildak Huseyin
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Mar;129(3):230-237. doi: 10.1177/0003489419882044. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
Characterize current perspectives in the surgical management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) to guide otolaryngologists in understanding United States practice patterns.
A retrospective analysis of ACS-NSQIP database was performed to abstract all patients from 2008 to 2016 who underwent VS resection using ICD-9/10 codes 225.1 and D33.3, respectively. The specific surgical approach employed was identified via CPT codes 61520, 61526/61596, and 61591, which represent retrosigmoid (RS), translabyrinthine (TL) and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches, respectively. Analyzed outcomes include general surgical complications, total length of stay, and reoperation.
A total of 1671 VS cases were identified, 1266 (75.7%) were RS, 292 (17.5%) were TL, and 114 (6.8%) were MCF. The annual number of cases increased over the study period from 15 to 375, which is chiefly attributed to increased institutional participation in ACS-NSQIP. Perioperative variables including BMI ( < .001), ASA class ( = .004), ethnicity ( = .008), operative time ( < .001), and reoperation ( < .001) were found to be statistically significant between cohorts. Increased utilization of RS approach was consistent over the entire study period, with significantly more RS performed than either TL or MCF. Finally, a statistically significant difference with respect to general surgical complication rates was not noted between surgical approaches.
There is increased employment of RS approach for the operative management of VS, which likely is the result of increased reliance on both stereotactic radiosurgery and observation as alternative treatment strategies.
描述当前前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)手术治疗的观点,以指导耳鼻喉科医生了解美国的治疗模式。
对美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库进行回顾性分析,提取2008年至2016年期间分别使用ICD-9/10编码225.1和D33.3进行VS切除的所有患者。通过CPT编码61520、61526/61596和61591确定所采用的具体手术入路,分别代表乙状窦后(RS)、经迷路(TL)和中颅窝(MCF)入路。分析的结果包括一般手术并发症、总住院时间和再次手术情况。
共识别出1671例VS病例,其中1266例(75.7%)采用RS入路,292例(17.5%)采用TL入路,114例(6.8%)采用MCF入路。在研究期间,病例年数从15例增加到375例,这主要归因于更多机构参与了ACS-NSQIP。发现围手术期变量包括体重指数(<0.001)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级(=0.004)、种族(=0.008)、手术时间(<0.001)和再次手术(<0.001)在不同队列之间具有统计学意义。在整个研究期间,RS入路的使用增加是一致的,采用RS入路的手术明显多于TL或MCF入路。最后,未观察到不同手术入路之间一般手术并发症发生率存在统计学显著差异。
RS入路在VS手术治疗中的应用增加,这可能是由于越来越依赖立体定向放射外科和观察作为替代治疗策略的结果。