Suppr超能文献

使用5A框架进行结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素:对美国研究的系统评价

Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies.

作者信息

Agunwamba Amenah A, Zhu Xuan, Sauver Jenny St, Thompson Gina, Helmueller Leah, Finney Rutten Lila J

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 29;35:102353. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Despite clear evidence that regular screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and the availability of multiple effective screening options, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. A systematic literature search of four databases - Ovid, Medline, EBSCHOhost, and Web of Science - was conducted to identify US studies published after 2017 that reported on barriers and facilitators to CRC screening adherence. Articles were extracted to categorize relevant CRC screening barriers or facilitators that were assessed against CRC screening outcomes using the 5As dimensions: Access, Affordability, Acceptance, Awareness, Activation. Sixty-one studies were included. Fifty determinants of screening within the 5As framework and two additional dimensions including Sociodemographics and Health Status were identified. The Sociodemographics, Access, and Affordability dimensions had the greatest number of studies included. The most common factor in the Access dimension was contact with healthcare systems, within the Affordability dimension was insurance, within the Awareness dimension was knowledge CRC screening, within the Acceptance dimension was health beliefs, within the Activation dimension was prompts and reminders, within the Sociodemographics dimension was race/ethnicity, and among the Health Status dimension was chronic disease history. Among all studies, contact with healthcare systems, insurance, race/ethnicity, age, and education were the most common factors identified. CRC screening barriers and facilitators were identified across individual, clinical, and sociocontextual levels. Interventions that consider multilevel strategies will most effectively increase CRC screening adherence.

摘要

尽管有明确证据表明定期筛查可降低结直肠癌(CRC)死亡率,且有多种有效的筛查方法可供选择,但在美国,CRC筛查的利用率仍然很低。我们对四个数据库——Ovid、Medline、EBSCHOhost和Web of Science进行了系统的文献检索,以确定2017年后发表的关于CRC筛查依从性障碍和促进因素的美国研究。提取文章以对相关的CRC筛查障碍或促进因素进行分类,这些因素使用5A维度(可及性、可负担性、接受度、认知度、行动激活)针对CRC筛查结果进行评估。纳入了61项研究。在5A框架内确定了50个筛查决定因素以及另外两个维度,包括社会人口统计学和健康状况。社会人口统计学、可及性和可负担性维度纳入的研究数量最多。可及性维度中最常见的因素是与医疗保健系统的接触,可负担性维度中是保险,认知度维度中是对CRC筛查的了解,接受度维度中是健康信念,行动激活维度中是提示和提醒,社会人口统计学维度中是种族/族裔,健康状况维度中是慢性病病史。在所有研究中,与医疗保健系统的接触、保险、种族/族裔、年龄和教育是最常见的确定因素。在个体、临床和社会背景层面都发现了CRC筛查的障碍和促进因素。考虑多层次策略的干预措施将最有效地提高CRC筛查的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d3/10415795/89b130f854a6/gr1a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验