Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado.
Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.
Genet Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;44(1):16-25. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22267. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been used to establish thousands of genetic associations across numerous phenotypes. To improve the power of GWAS and generalize associations across ethnic groups, transethnic meta-analysis methods are used to combine the results of several GWAS from diverse ancestries. The goal of this study is to identify genetic associations for eight quantitative metabolic syndrome (MetS) traits through a meta-analysis across four ethnic groups. Traits were measured in the GENetics of Noninsulin dependent Diabetes Mellitus (GENNID) Study which consists of African-American (families = 73, individuals = 288), European-American (families = 79, individuals = 519), Japanese-American (families = 17, individuals = 132), and Mexican-American (families = 113, individuals = 610) samples. Genome-wide association results from these four ethnic groups were combined using four meta-analysis methods: fixed effects, random effects, TransMeta, and MR-MEGA. We provide an empirical comparison of the four meta-analysis methods from the GENNID results, discuss which types of loci (characterized by allelic heterogeneity) appear to be better detected by each of the four meta-analysis methods in the GENNID Study, and validate our results using previous genetic discoveries. We specifically compare the two transethnic methods, TransMeta and MR-MEGA, and discuss how each transethnic method's framework relates to the types of loci best detected by each method.
全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已被用于在众多表型中建立数千个遗传关联。为了提高 GWAS 的效力并将关联推广到不同的种族群体,跨种族荟萃分析方法被用于结合来自不同种族的多个 GWAS 的结果。本研究的目的是通过对四个种族的荟萃分析,确定八个定量代谢综合征(MetS)特征的遗传关联。在由非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病遗传研究(GENNID)组成的研究中测量了特征,该研究包括非裔美国人(家庭=73,个体=288)、欧洲裔美国人(家庭=79,个体=519)、日裔美国人(家庭=17,个体=132)和墨西哥裔美国人(家庭=113,个体=610)样本。使用四种荟萃分析方法:固定效应、随机效应、TransMeta 和 MR-MEGA,对这四个种族的全基因组关联结果进行了组合。我们从 GENNID 结果中对这四种荟萃分析方法进行了实证比较,讨论了哪些类型的位点(特征是等位基因异质性)似乎更能被 GENNID 研究中的四种荟萃分析方法中的每一种检测到,并使用以前的遗传发现验证了我们的结果。我们特别比较了两种跨种族方法,TransMeta 和 MR-MEGA,并讨论了每种跨种族方法的框架如何与每种方法最佳检测到的位点类型相关。