Chadha Nanaki J, Turner Martin J, Slater Matthew J
Life Sciences and Education, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 10;10:2295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02295. eCollection 2019.
On approach to competitive situations, affective states (emotions and anxiety) occur through the complex interaction of cognitive antecedents. Researchers have intimated that irrational beliefs might play an important role in the relationship between cognitive appraisals and affective states, but has ignored challenge and threat. In the current research, we examine the interaction between cognitive appraisals, irrational beliefs, and challenge and threat to predict golfers' pre-competitive affective states. We adopted a cross-sectional atemporal design to examine how golfers approached two different competitive situations: imagined imminent golf competition (phase 1), and actual future golf competition (phase 2). Path analysis revealed how cognitive appraisals, irrational beliefs, and challenge and threat interact to predict affective states among golfers. Serial atemporal multiple mediation analysis indicated that the relationships between cognitive appraisals and affective states were mediated by irrational beliefs and challenge and threat. Further, some differences were revealed between phase 1 and phase 2 in the serial multiple atemporal mediation results with regard to challenge. That is, at phase 1 no significant serial mediation was found for any affective outcomes, but at phase 2 significant serial mediation was found for all affective states, showing that irrational beliefs and challenge serial mediated the associations between cognitive appraisals and affective states. The finding that mediation and bivariate associations differed across phase 1 and phase 2 is echoed in the phase 1-phase 2 tests of differences. The current research makes a theoretical advancement by elucidating in more detail the complex interaction between cognitive antecedents and mediators of affective states. Specifically, the inclusion of challenge and threat alongside irrational beliefs and cognitive appraisals is an important theoretical advancement that builds on work inside of sport literature (e.g., Dixon et al., 2016) and outside of sport literature (e.g., David et al., 2002, 2005), as this constellation of theoretically related antecedents of affective states has not been examined together in the extant research.
在面对竞争情境时,情感状态(情绪和焦虑)通过认知前因的复杂相互作用而产生。研究人员暗示,非理性信念可能在认知评估与情感状态之间的关系中发挥重要作用,但却忽略了挑战和威胁。在当前的研究中,我们考察了认知评估、非理性信念以及挑战和威胁之间的相互作用,以预测高尔夫球手赛前的情感状态。我们采用了横断面非时间性设计,来考察高尔夫球手如何应对两种不同的竞争情境:想象即将到来的高尔夫比赛(阶段1)和实际未来的高尔夫比赛(阶段2)。路径分析揭示了认知评估、非理性信念以及挑战和威胁如何相互作用以预测高尔夫球手中的情感状态。系列非时间性多重中介分析表明,认知评估与情感状态之间的关系由非理性信念以及挑战和威胁介导。此外,在系列多重非时间性中介结果中,阶段1和阶段2在挑战方面存在一些差异。也就是说,在阶段1,未发现任何情感结果存在显著的系列中介,但在阶段2,所有情感状态均发现了显著的系列中介,表明非理性信念和挑战系列中介了认知评估与情感状态之间的关联。阶段1和阶段2之间中介和双变量关联存在差异这一发现,在阶段1 - 阶段2差异检验中得到了印证。当前的研究通过更详细地阐明认知前因与情感状态中介之间的复杂相互作用,取得了理论上的进展。具体而言,将挑战和威胁与非理性信念及认知评估一同纳入,是一项重要的理论进展,它建立在体育文献(如Dixon等人,2016)和体育文献之外(如David等人,2002年、2005年)的研究基础之上,因为情感状态这一理论相关前因的组合在现有研究中尚未被一起考察过。