Schreuders Michael, Linnansaari Anu, Lindfors Pirjo, van den Putte Bas, Kunst Anton E
Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Unit of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Health Promot Int. 2020 Oct 1;35(5):1106-1115. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz111.
Secondary schools in European countries increasingly implement comprehensive smoke-free school policies (SFSPs) that prohibit most or even all adolescents from smoking during school hours. Consistent enforcement of SFSPs is essential for realizing optimum effectiveness. A main challenge represents adolescents who persistently violate the rules. We studied how staff in European countries respond to these persistent violators and why they may turn a blind eye. We used interview transcripts from 69 staff members at 22 schools in 6 European countries to identify cases in which staff turned a blind eye. We then applied thematic analysis for identifying the considerations as to why they turn a blind eye. Turning a blind eye on persistent violators happened among school staff in all six countries. Three considerations were identified. First, staff believe their primary role and duty is to support all adolescents to develop into well-functioning adults, and sometimes it is best to accept smoking. Second, staff expect that applying stricter disciplinary measures will not stop persistent violators and is more likely to create more severe problems. Third, staff do not feel supported by relevant actors in society (e.g. parents) in influencing adolescent smoking. We conclude that staff's considerations stress the need to support school staff in enforcing the increasingly comprehensive rules on the most persistent smokers.
欧洲国家的中学越来越多地实施全面无烟学校政策(SFSPs),该政策禁止大多数甚至所有青少年在上课时间吸烟。持续执行无烟学校政策对于实现最佳效果至关重要。一个主要挑战来自那些持续违反规定的青少年。我们研究了欧洲国家的工作人员如何应对这些屡教不改的违规者,以及他们为何可能视而不见。我们使用了来自6个欧洲国家22所学校的69名工作人员的访谈记录,以确定工作人员视而不见的案例。然后,我们应用主题分析来确定他们视而不见的原因。所有六个国家的学校工作人员中都存在对屡教不改的违规者视而不见的情况。我们确定了三个原因。第一,工作人员认为他们的主要角色和职责是支持所有青少年成长为功能良好的成年人,有时最好接受吸烟行为。第二,工作人员预计,采取更严格的纪律措施并不能阻止屡教不改的违规者,反而更有可能引发更严重的问题。第三,工作人员感到在影响青少年吸烟问题上未得到社会相关行为者(如家长)的支持。我们得出结论,工作人员的这些考虑凸显了支持学校工作人员对最顽固的吸烟者执行日益全面的规定的必要性。