P McCulloch Steven
Centre for Animal Welfare, University of Winchester, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK.
Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 28;9(11):877. doi: 10.3390/ani9110877.
The British people voted in a 2016 referendum to leave the European Union (EU). Brexit presents threats and opportunities to animal protection in the United Kingdom (UK), the EU, and internationally. This paper discusses opportunities for animal protection in terms of five criteria. These are first, political context; second, regulatory changes; third, economic and trade factors; fourth, institutional- and capacity-related factors; and fifth, EU and international considerations. Brexit permits reform of UK agricultural policy outside of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to reward high welfare as a public good. The Agriculture Bill, however, does not suggest a radical reform agenda for animal welfare. Brexit permits a ban on live exports, but the UK Government is consulting on improving welfare, not prohibition. Brexit provides an opportunity to ban the import and sale of fur, but the UK Government has signalled it will work to improve welfare in fur farming. Brexit permits the UK to prohibit the import and sale of foie gras, but the Government has stated a ban may be challenged at the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Brexit allows more stringent Pet Travel Scheme (PETS) requirements to reduce puppy smuggling. Lucy's Law and stricter enforcement will also mitigate the problem. New sentience legislation provides the opportunity for a fully independent and properly constituted UK Animal Welfare Advisory body conducting animal welfare impact assessments and ethical appraisal. The Government has proposed sentience legislation but there is a major risk it will not be in place before the UK leaves the EU. The Government has expanded the remit of the Farm Animal Welfare Committee, which is not fully independent and is dominated by veterinary members and agricultural interests. Brexit provides some opportunities for animal protection with radical reform of agricultural policy, prohibition of live exports, and banning the import and sale of fur and foie gras. Pre-Brexit, the Government has not demonstrated the political will and commitment to realise these opportunities.
2016年,英国民众在全民公投中投票决定退出欧盟(EU)。脱欧给英国、欧盟乃至国际层面的动物保护带来了威胁与机遇。本文从五个标准探讨了动物保护的机遇。这五个标准分别为:其一,政治背景;其二,监管变化;其三,经济与贸易因素;其四,与机构及能力相关的因素;其五,欧盟及国际层面的考量。脱欧使英国能够在脱离共同农业政策(CAP)的框架下改革农业政策,将高福利作为公共利益予以奖励。然而,《农业法案》并未提出激进的动物福利改革议程。脱欧允许禁止活体出口,但英国政府正在就改善福利而非禁止进行磋商。脱欧为禁止进口和销售毛皮提供了契机,但英国政府已表明将致力于改善毛皮养殖中的动物福利。脱欧使英国能够禁止进口和销售肥鹅肝,但政府表示这一禁令可能会在世界贸易组织(WTO)面临挑战。脱欧允许实施更严格的宠物旅行计划(PETS)要求以减少幼犬走私。《露西法案》及更严格的执法也将缓解这一问题。新的感知力立法为一个完全独立且构成合理的英国动物福利咨询机构提供了机会,该机构可进行动物福利影响评估和伦理评价。政府已提出感知力立法,但存在重大风险,即在英国脱欧前该立法无法到位。政府扩大了农场动物福利委员会的职权范围,该委员会并非完全独立,且由兽医成员和农业利益主导。脱欧通过农业政策的激进改革、禁止活体出口以及禁止进口和销售毛皮与肥鹅肝,为动物保护提供了一些机遇。在脱欧前,政府并未展现出实现这些机遇的政治意愿和决心。