Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA
Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;104(7):980-984. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314611. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
To understand the added value of Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) measurements to conventional circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cpRNFL) thickness measurements on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging for discriminating between perimetric glaucoma and healthy eyes, evaluated through a qualitative evaluation.
384 healthy eyes and 188 glaucoma eyes were evaluated, and glaucoma eyes were categorised as perimetric (n=107) based on a history of ≥3 consecutive abnormal 24-2 visual field tests or suspected glaucoma if they did not (n=81). OCT-derived BMO-MRW and cpRNFL reports were qualitatively evaluated by two experienced graders in isolation at first, and then by using both reports combined. The diagnostic performance (sensitivity at 95% specificity, total and partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of detecting perimetric glaucoma with each method were compared.
All diagnostic performance measures for detecting perimetric glaucoma eyes were not significantly different when using either the cpRNFL or BMO-MRW reports alone compared with using both reports combined (p≥0.190), nor when comparing the use of each report in isolation (p≥0.500).
Experienced graders exhibited no difference in discriminating between perimetric glaucoma and healthy eyes when using a cpRNFL report alone, the BMO-MRW report alone or the two reports combined. Therefore, either OCT imaging report of the neuroretinal tissue could be used effectively for detecting perimetric glaucoma, but further studies are needed to determine whether there are specific advantages of each method, or the combination of both, when evaluating eyes that have a greater degree of diagnostic uncertainty.
通过定性评估,了解在光学相干断层扫描(OCT)成像中,Bruch 膜开口最小边缘宽度(BMO-MRW)测量对传统的脉络膜视网膜神经纤维层(cpRNFL)厚度测量在鉴别青光眼和正常眼中的附加值。
评估了 384 只正常眼和 188 只青光眼眼,根据≥3 次连续异常 24-2 视野测试的病史,将青光眼眼分为视野性(n=107),或者如果没有这种病史,则将其归类为疑似青光眼(n=81)。首先由两名有经验的评分员分别对 OCT 衍生的 BMO-MRW 和 cpRNFL 报告进行定性评估,然后结合使用这两种报告。比较了每种方法检测视野性青光眼的诊断性能(95%特异性时的敏感性、总和部分受试者工作特征曲线下面积)。
当单独使用 cpRNFL 或 BMO-MRW 报告与联合使用两种报告时,检测视野性青光眼眼的所有诊断性能指标均无显著差异(p≥0.190),也没有比较单独使用每种报告时的差异(p≥0.500)。
有经验的评分员在单独使用 cpRNFL 报告、单独使用 BMO-MRW 报告或联合使用两种报告时,在鉴别视野性青光眼和正常眼方面没有差异。因此,神经视网膜组织的任何一种 OCT 成像报告都可以有效地用于检测视野性青光眼,但需要进一步的研究来确定每种方法或两者结合在评估具有更大诊断不确定性的眼睛时是否具有特定的优势。