Suppr超能文献

社区药物分发者在被忽视热带病规划中的大规模药物治疗中的作用:系统评价和政策文件分析。

Community drug distributors for mass drug administration in neglected tropical disease programmes: systematic review and analysis of policy documents.

机构信息

Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020414. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020414.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mass drug administration (MDA) programmes for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) depend on voluntary community drug distributors (CDDs) to deliver drugs, and these volunteer schemes need regular training and supervision. NTD policy now includes integration of multiple disease programmes, but we are unsure if there is clarity in what is currently expected of CDDs and how they are managed. We therefore analysed World Health Organization (WHO) policy, strategy and implementation guidance, and select national NTD programme implementation plans.

METHODS

Included are a) WHO global and WHO-Regional Office for Africa guidelines, strategies, operational manuals and meeting reports published between January 2007 to February 2018 that included policy and plans for CDDs; and b) national NTD programme master plans for Cameroon, Ghana, Liberia and Nigeria. For both review components, we examined the CDD responsibilities through a framework developed iteratively against the documents and prepared a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Twenty WHO policy documents met the inclusion criteria. In the twelve global and eight regional documents, the CDD role was not explicitly or comprehensively defined. Three documents mentioned CDDs will distribute drugs; some mentioned health promotion, data handling and engagement in clinical care. Four WHO documents noted a need for CDD training or management, eight detailed some aspect of this, and one regional document provided a comprehensive overview. In the national plans, additional responsibilities included case management in two countries and transmission control in two countries. Every plan included training and supervision, but this was not always explicit, and details of the purpose and frequency varied. In all national plans, CDD motivation was identified as a challenge but not comprehensively addressed, although one document mentioned provision of bicycles.

CONCLUSIONS

WHO and national policies and plans assume CDDs will implement NTD programmes. However, there is almost no clear delineation of responsibilities, nor is there up-to-date practical guidance to guide managers. This ambiguity, in relation to the lack of explicit policies or programmatic guidance, probably impairs the effectiveness of NTD programmes.

摘要

背景

被忽视的热带病(NTD)大规模药物治疗(MDA)计划依赖社区志愿药物分发员(CDD)来分发药物,这些志愿计划需要定期培训和监督。NTD 政策现在包括多个疾病项目的整合,但我们不确定 CDD 的职责和管理方式是否明确。因此,我们分析了世界卫生组织(WHO)的政策、战略和实施指南,并选择了一些国家的 NTD 项目实施计划。

方法

包括 a)WHO 全球和非洲区域办事处 2007 年 1 月至 2018 年 2 月期间发布的包含 CDD 政策和计划的全球和区域指南、战略、操作手册和会议报告;以及 b)喀麦隆、加纳、利比里亚和尼日利亚的国家 NTD 项目总计划。对于这两个审查部分,我们通过针对文件逐步制定的框架检查了 CDD 的职责,并编写了一份叙述性综述。

结果

有 20 份 WHO 政策文件符合纳入标准。在 12 份全球文件和 8 份区域文件中,CDD 的角色没有明确或全面定义。三份文件提到 CDD 将分发药物;有些文件提到了健康促进、数据处理和参与临床护理。四份 WHO 文件指出需要 CDD 培训或管理,八份文件详细说明了这方面的某些方面,一份区域文件提供了全面概述。在国家计划中,两个国家的 CDD 还负责病例管理,两个国家的 CDD 负责传播控制。每个计划都包括培训和监督,但这并不总是明确的,目的和频率的细节也有所不同。在所有国家计划中,CDD 的激励被确定为一个挑战,但没有得到全面解决,尽管有一份文件提到提供自行车。

结论

WHO 和国家政策和计划假设 CDD 将实施 NTD 项目。然而,几乎没有明确划分职责,也没有最新的实用指南来指导管理人员。这种模糊性,以及缺乏明确的政策或方案指导,可能会削弱 NTD 项目的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a90/6790237/81bb6469015e/jogh-09-020414-F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验