Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Faculty of International Liberal Arts, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):1415. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7637-9.
Appropriate contraceptive use remains a major health challenge in rural Jordan. The Japan International Cooperation Agency implemented a project aimed at enhancing the capacity of village health centers (VHCs) to improve the quality and quantity of family planning (FP) services in rural Jordan in 2016-2018. Facility- and community-based approaches were integrated into the interventions. We evaluated the project's impacts on contraceptive behaviors and the effectiveness of the two approaches.
We used a difference-in-differences analysis based on the project baseline and endline surveys, and logistic regression analysis to assess associations between eight primary outcomes and three secondary outcomes (impacts). The unit of intervention was five target VHCs; the unit of analysis was currently married women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in five intervention and five control villages.
Overall, 2061 married women participated; 83.8% were in need of FP. Compared with the control villages, significant effects, ranging from + 0.4% points (pp) to + 11.5 pp., were observed in the intervention villages for six primary outcomes in these categories: increasing the use of FP services at VHCs, participation in health promotion activities, and changing the sources of reproductive health information. There was a trend toward improved secondary outcomes in the intervention villages, but no significant differences were observed between the intervention and control villages regarding modern contraceptive use (mCU; + 4.3 pp), traditional contraceptive use (tCU; - 0.5 pp), and spousal agreement on contraception (+ 5.1 pp). mCU was positively associated with five primary outcomes: obtaining contraceptives at VHCs [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-9.40], education sessions at VHC (AOR 7.41, 95% CI 1.60-34.39), health activities in communities (AOR 7.41, 95% CI 3.28-16.78), counseling by private doctor/clinic (AOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.97), and information gained through TV (AOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.76). Spousal agreement on contraception showed similar positive trends. tCU was associated only with TV.
The project had impacts on increased mCU and husbands' perception of contraception in rural Jordan. The integration of facility- and community-based approaches may be effective in shifting from tCU to mCU in other rural areas.
在约旦农村,适当的避孕措施仍然是一个主要的健康挑战。日本国际协力机构(JICA)于 2016-2018 年实施了一个项目,旨在增强乡村卫生中心(VHC)的能力,以提高约旦农村的计划生育(FP)服务质量和数量。该项目将基于设施和社区的方法纳入干预措施中。我们评估了该项目对避孕行为的影响以及这两种方法的效果。
我们使用基于项目基线和终线调查的差异中的差异分析以及逻辑回归分析来评估与八项主要结果和三项次要结果(影响)之间的关联。干预的单位是五个目标 VHC;分析单位是五个干预村和五个对照村的已婚育龄妇女(15-49 岁)。
共有 2061 名已婚妇女参加;83.8%的人需要 FP。与对照村相比,干预村在以下类别的六项主要结果中观察到显著影响,范围从+0.4%点(pp)到+11.5 pp:增加在 VHC 使用 FP 服务、参与健康促进活动和改变生殖健康信息来源。干预村的次要结果也呈现出改善的趋势,但在现代避孕方法(mCU;+4.3 pp)、传统避孕方法(tCU;-0.5 pp)和避孕方法上配偶之间的同意(+5.1 pp)方面,干预村与对照村之间没有观察到显著差异。mCU 与五项主要结果呈正相关:在 VHC 获得避孕药具[调整后的优势比(AOR)3.44,95%置信区间(CI)1.26-9.40]、VHC 教育课程(AOR 7.41,95% CI 1.60-34.39)、社区卫生活动(AOR 7.41,95% CI 3.28-16.78)、私人医生/诊所咨询(AOR 0.62,95% CI 0.40-0.97)和通过电视获得的信息(AOR 0.50,95% CI 0.32-0.76)。在避孕方法上配偶之间的同意也表现出类似的积极趋势。tCU 仅与电视相关。
该项目对约旦农村地区 mCU 和丈夫对避孕的看法增加产生了影响。在其他农村地区,将基于设施和社区的方法相结合,可能有助于从 tCU 转变为 mCU。