Center on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA.
Joint Doctoral Program, San Diego State University/University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 12;16(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0844-0.
We examine the association between the quality of family planning (FP) counseling received in past 24 months, and current modern contraceptive use, initiation, and continuation, among a sample of women in rural Uttar Pradesh, India.
This study included data from a longitudinal study with two rounds of representative household survey (2014 and 2016), with currently married women of age 15-49 years; the analysis excluded women who were already using a permanent method of contraceptive during the first round of survey and who reported discontinuation because they wanted to be pregnant (N = 1398). We measured quality of FP counseling using four items on whether women were informed of advantages and disadvantages of different methods, were told of method(s) that are appropriate for them, whether their questions were answered, and whether they perceived the counseling to be helpful. Positive responses to every item was categorized as higher quality counseling, vs lower quality counseling for positive response to less than four items. Outcome variables included modern contraceptive use during the second round of survey, and a variable categorizing women based on their contraceptive use behavior during the two rounds: continued-users, new-users, discontinued-users, and non-users.
Around 22% had received any FP counseling; only 4% received higher-quality counseling. Those who received lower-quality FP counseling had 2.42x the odds of reporting current use of any modern contraceptive method (95% CI: 1.56-3.76), and those who received higher quality FP counseling at 4.14x the odds of reporting modern contraceptive use (95% CI: 1.72-9.99), as compared to women reporting no FP counseling. Women receiving higher-quality counseling also had higher likelihood of continued use (ARRR 5.93; 95% CI: 1.97-17.83), as well as new use or initiation (ARRR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.44-12.35) of modern contraceptives. Receipt of lower-quality counseling also showed statistically significant associations with continued and new use of modern contraceptives, but the effect sizes were smaller than those for higher-quality counseling.
Findings suggest the value of FP counseling. With a patient-centered approach to counseling, continued use of modern contraceptives can be supported among married women of reproductive age. Unfortunately, FP counseling, particularly higher-quality FP counseling remains rare.
我们考察了在过去 24 个月内接受计划生育咨询的质量与当前现代避孕措施使用、初次使用和持续使用之间的关系,该研究对象为印度北方邦农村地区的已婚育龄妇女。
本研究纳入了一项具有两轮代表性家庭调查(2014 年和 2016 年)的纵向研究数据,调查对象为年龄在 15-49 岁的目前已婚妇女;该分析排除了在第一轮调查中已经使用永久性避孕方法且报告因想要怀孕而停药的妇女(N=1398)。我们使用四项指标衡量计划生育咨询的质量,分别是妇女是否了解不同方法的优缺点、是否被告知适合她们的方法、她们的问题是否得到解答以及她们是否认为咨询有帮助。对每一项指标的肯定回答均归类为高质量咨询,而对少于四项指标的肯定回答归类为低质量咨询。主要结局变量为第二轮调查中的现代避孕措施使用情况,以及一个根据两轮调查中妇女的避孕行为进行分类的变量:持续使用者、新使用者、停药使用者和未使用者。
约 22%的人接受过任何计划生育咨询;只有 4%的人接受了高质量咨询。接受低质量计划生育咨询的人报告当前使用任何现代避孕方法的几率是未接受咨询者的 2.42 倍(95%CI:1.56-3.76),而接受高质量计划生育咨询的人报告现代避孕方法使用率则是未接受咨询者的 4.14 倍(95%CI:1.72-9.99)。与未接受计划生育咨询的妇女相比,接受高质量咨询的妇女更有可能继续使用(ARR 5.93;95%CI:1.97-17.83),以及初次使用或开始使用(ARR:4.2;95%CI:1.44-12.35)现代避孕措施。接受低质量咨询也与现代避孕措施的持续使用和初次使用呈显著统计学关联,但效果大小低于高质量咨询。
研究结果表明计划生育咨询具有重要价值。通过以患者为中心的咨询方法,可以支持已婚育龄妇女继续使用现代避孕措施。不幸的是,计划生育咨询,特别是高质量的计划生育咨询仍然很少见。