Chaemsaithong P, Sahota D, Pooh R K, Zheng M, Ma R, Chaiyasit N, Koide K, Shaw S W, Seshadri S, Choolani M, Panchalee T, Yapan P, Sim W S, Sekizawa A, Hu Y, Shiozaki A, Saito S, Leung T Y, Poon L C
Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
CRIFM Clinical Research Institute of Fetal Medicine PMC, Osaka, Japan.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;56(2):206-214. doi: 10.1002/uog.21905. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
To (i) evaluate the applicability of the European-derived biomarker multiples of the median (MoM) formulae for risk assessment of preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) in seven Asian populations, spanning the east, southeast and south regions of the continent, (ii) perform quality-assurance (QA) assessment of the biomarker measurements and (iii) establish criteria for prospective ongoing QA assessment of biomarker measurements.
This was a prospective, non-intervention, multicenter study in 4023 singleton pregnancies, at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation, in 11 recruiting centers in China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand. Women were screened for preterm PE between December 2016 and June 2018 and gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Maternal and pregnancy characteristics were recorded and mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and maternal serum placental growth factor (PlGF) were measured in accordance with The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) standardized measurement protocols. MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF were transformed into MoMs using the published FMF formulae, derived from a largely Caucasian population in Europe, which adjust for gestational age and covariates that affect directly the biomarker levels. Variations in biomarker MoM values and their dispersion (SD) and cumulative sum tests over time were evaluated in order to identify systematic deviations in biomarker measurements from the expected distributions.
In the total screened population, the median (95% CI) MoM values of MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF were 0.961 (0.956-0.965), 1.018 (0.996-1.030) and 0.891 (0.861-0.909), respectively. Women in this largely Asian cohort had approximately 4% and 11% lower MAP and PlGF MoM levels, respectively, compared with those expected from normal median formulae, based on a largely Caucasian population, whilst UtA-PI MoM values were similar. UtA-PI and PlGF MoMs were beyond the 0.4 to 2.5 MoM range (truncation limits) in 16 (0.4%) and 256 (6.4%) pregnancies, respectively. QA assessment tools indicated that women in all centers had consistently lower MAP MoM values than expected, but were within 10% of the expected value. UtA-PI MoM values were within 10% of the expected value at all sites except one. Most PlGF MoM values were systematically 10% lower than the expected value, except for those derived from a South Asian population, which were 37% higher.
Owing to the anthropometric differences in Asian compared with Caucasian women, significant differences in biomarker MoM values for PE screening, particularly MAP and PlGF MoMs, were noted in Asian populations compared with the expected values based on European-derived formulae. If reliable and consistent patient-specific risks for preterm PE are to be reported, adjustment for additional factors or development of Asian-specific formulae for the calculation of biomarker MoMs is required. We have also demonstrated the importance and need for regular quality assessment of biomarker values. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
(i) 评估源自欧洲的生物标志物中位数倍数(MoM)公式在亚洲七个不同人群(涵盖亚洲大陆东部、东南部和南部地区)中用于早产子痫前期(PE)风险评估的适用性;(ii) 对生物标志物测量进行质量保证(QA)评估;(iii) 为生物标志物测量的前瞻性持续QA评估制定标准。
这是一项前瞻性、非干预性的多中心研究,纳入了来自中国、中国香港、印度、日本、新加坡、中国台湾和泰国11个招募中心的4023例单胎妊娠,妊娠周数为11至13⁺⁶周。在2016年12月至2018年6月期间对孕妇进行早产PE筛查,孕妇均签署书面知情同意书参与本研究。记录孕妇和妊娠特征,并根据胎儿医学基金会(FMF)标准化测量方案测量平均动脉压(MAP)、平均子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI)和孕妇血清胎盘生长因子(PlGF)。使用源自欧洲主要白种人群的已发表FMF公式将MAP、UtA-PI和PlGF转换为MoM,该公式针对孕周和直接影响生物标志物水平的协变量进行了校正。评估生物标志物MoM值的变化及其离散度(标准差)和随时间的累积和检验,以确定生物标志物测量值与预期分布之间的系统偏差。
在整个筛查人群中,MAP、UtA-PI和PlGF的中位数(95%CI)MoM值分别为0.961(0.956 - 0.965)、1.018(0.996 - 1.030)和0.891(0.861 - 0.909)。与基于主要白种人群的正常中位数公式预期值相比,这个主要为亚洲人群队列中的孕妇MAP和PlGF的MoM水平分别低约4%和11%,而UtA-PI的MoM值相似。在16例(0.4%)和256例(6.4%)妊娠中,UtA-PI和PlGF的MoM超出了0.4至2.5 MoM范围(截断限值)。QA评估工具表明,所有中心的孕妇MAP的MoM值始终低于预期,但在预期值的10%以内。除一个中心外,所有中心的UtA-PI的MoM值均在预期值的10%以内。大多数PlGF的MoM值系统地比预期值低10%,但源自南亚人群的PlGF的MoM值高37%。
由于亚洲女性与白种女性在人体测量学上存在差异,与基于欧洲公式的预期值相比,亚洲人群中用于PE筛查的生物标志物MoM值存在显著差异,尤其是MAP和PlGF的MoM值。如果要报告可靠且一致的早产PE患者特异性风险,则需要对其他因素进行校正或开发亚洲特异性公式来计算生物标志物的MoM值。我们还证明了对生物标志物值进行定期质量评估的重要性和必要性。版权所有©2019国际妇产科超声学会。由约翰·威利父子有限公司出版。