Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain.
Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):522-530. doi: 10.1002/uog.26233.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing-risks model, incorporating maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and placental growth factor (PlGF) (the 'triple test'), for the prediction at 11-13 weeks' gestation of preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) in a Spanish population.
This was a prospective cohort study performed in eight fetal medicine units in five different regions of Spain between September 2017 and December 2019. All pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy and a non-malformed live fetus attending a routine ultrasound examination at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation were invited to participate. Maternal demographic characteristics and medical history were recorded and MAP, UtA-PI, serum PlGF and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) were measured following standardized protocols. Treatment with aspirin during pregnancy was also recorded. Raw values of biomarkers were converted into multiples of the median (MoM), and audits were performed periodically to provide regular feedback to operators and laboratories. Patient-specific risks for term and preterm PE were calculated according to the FMF competing-risks model, blinded to pregnancy outcome. The performance of screening for PE, taking into account aspirin use, was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and detection rate (DR) at a 10% fixed screen-positive rate (SPR). Risk calibration of the model was assessed.
The study population comprised 10 110 singleton pregnancies, including 72 (0.7%) that developed preterm PE. In the preterm PE group, compared to those without PE, median MAP MoM and UtA-PI MoM were significantly higher, and median serum PlGF MoM and PAPP-A MoM were significantly lower. In women with PE, the deviation from normal in all biomarkers was inversely related to gestational age at delivery. Screening for preterm PE by a combination of maternal characteristics and medical history with MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF had a DR, at 10% SPR, of 72.7% (95% CI, 62.9-82.6%). An alternative strategy of replacing PlGF with PAPP-A in the triple test was associated with poorer screening performance for preterm PE, giving a DR of 66.5% (95% CI, 55.8-77.2%). The calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted risk and observed incidence of preterm PE, with a slope of 0.983 (95% CI, 0.846-1.120) and an intercept of 0.154 (95% CI, -0.091 to 0.397).
The FMF model is effective in predicting preterm PE in the Spanish population at 11-13 weeks' gestation. This method of screening is feasible to implement in routine clinical practice, but it should be accompanied by a robust audit and monitoring system, in order to maintain high-quality screening. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
评估胎儿医学基金会(FMF)竞争风险模型的诊断准确性,该模型纳入了母体特征、平均动脉压(MAP)、子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI)和胎盘生长因子(PlGF)(“三联检测”),用于预测西班牙人群中 11-13 孕周早产子痫前期(PE)的风险。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,在西班牙五个不同地区的八个胎儿医学中心进行,于 2017 年 9 月至 2019 年 12 月期间招募了所有接受 11+0 至 13+6 孕周常规超声检查的单胎妊娠和活胎孕妇。记录了产妇的人口统计学特征和病史,并按照标准方案测量了 MAP、UtA-PI、血清 PlGF 和妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A(PAPP-A)。还记录了孕期阿司匹林治疗情况。生物标志物的原始值被转换为中位数倍数(MoM),并定期进行审核,为操作人员和实验室提供定期反馈。根据 FMF 竞争风险模型计算了患者发生足月和早产 PE 的个体风险,结果与妊娠结局无关。通过计算接受阿司匹林治疗和未接受阿司匹林治疗患者的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)和检测率(DR),评估了 PE 筛查的性能,DR 为 10%固定筛查阳性率(SPR)。评估了模型的风险校准情况。
研究人群包括 10110 例单胎妊娠,其中 72 例(0.7%)发生早产 PE。在早产 PE 组中,与无 PE 组相比,MAP MoM 和 UtA-PI MoM 中位数显著升高,而血清 PlGF MoM 和 PAPP-A MoM 中位数显著降低。在发生 PE 的孕妇中,所有生物标志物的偏离正常情况与分娩时的孕周呈反比。通过将母体特征和病史与 MAP、UtA-PI 和 PlGF 相结合进行早产 PE 筛查,在 10%SPR 时的 DR 为 72.7%(95%CI,62.9-82.6%)。用 PAPP-A 替代三联检测中的 PlGF 的替代策略与早产 PE 筛查的性能较差相关,DR 为 66.5%(95%CI,55.8-77.2%)。校准图显示预测风险与早产 PE 的实际发生率之间具有良好的一致性,斜率为 0.983(95%CI,0.846-1.120),截距为 0.154(95%CI,-0.091 至 0.397)。
FMF 模型可有效预测西班牙人群中 11-13 孕周的早产 PE。这种筛查方法在常规临床实践中是可行的,但需要伴随一个强大的审核和监测系统,以保持高质量的筛查。© 2023 年国际妇产科超声学会。